Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Identity Crisis // Ancient Hebrews ?? / A Brief History Of The Terms For "Jew"
abusive:
--- Quote from: Sccit on July 17, 2022, 09:32:26 AM ---
i proved it in multiple threads where u stumbled vigorously with try hard talking points that got shot down wit ease
go back n re-read
that quote you pulled was about the suffix ish. which you tried to claim was some sort of reason to doubt the validity of jews. but when i showed you the englISH definition for ish which proclaims it a suffix for a group of people (ala british, irish, turkish, scottish etc.), you asked me to prove it further, which just made u look funnystyle. like asking to prove that money means currency. LOL. U CAN DO BETTER FOLKS.
--- End quote ---
nah.
Simply adding ish to something doesn't prove a correlation. Me saying I'm dogish doesn't mean that I'm a descendant of a dog.
--- Quote from: Sccit on July 17, 2022, 09:40:13 AM ---read this book if you would like to discuss further
https://www.amazon.com/Black-Hebrew-Israelites-Debunked-Deflated-ebook/dp/B07ZXKBK2H
--- End quote ---
This discussion has nothing to do with black Hebrew israelites. O ce again you don't even know what you're arguing against.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: abusive on July 17, 2022, 10:27:12 AM ---nah.
Simply adding ish to something doesn't prove a correlation. Me saying I'm dogish doesn't mean that I'm a descendant of a dog.
This discussion has nothing to do with black Hebrew israelites. O ce again you don't even know what you're arguing against.
--- End quote ---
what does saying you’re stylish indicate? how about turkish?
you fail basic english and want me to take you serious.
abusive:
--- Quote from: Sccit on July 17, 2022, 02:57:41 PM ---what does saying you’re stylish indicate? how about turkish?
you fail basic english and want me to take you serious.
--- End quote ---
Just say you can't prove you have any relation to scriptural jews instead of putting up red herring arguments.
red her·ring
/ˈˌred ˈheriNG/
noun
1.
a dried smoked herring, which is turned red by the smoke.
2.
something, especially a clue, that is or is intended to be misleading or distracting.
I'll repeat myself though. Calling yourself jewish doesn't mean that you're a jew. I'm thankful that Miko said what needed to be said. The entire world has bought into and accepted a massive deception and it's about time people asked the "jewish" community to put up the evidence. When they can't, the true jews need to be given their identity back.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: abusive on July 17, 2022, 03:28:12 PM ---Just say you can't prove you have any relation to scriptural jews instead of putting up red herring arguments.
red her·ring
/ˈˌred ˈheriNG/
noun
1.
a dried smoked herring, which is turned red by the smoke.
2.
something, especially a clue, that is or is intended to be misleading or distracting.
I'll repeat myself though. Calling yourself jewish doesn't mean that you're a jew. I'm thankful that Miko said what needed to be said. The entire world has bought into and accepted a massive deception and it's about time people asked the "jewish" community to put up the evidence. When they can't, the true jews need to be given their identity back.
--- End quote ---
but you’re the one who brought up the “ish” talking point, which, once again, has been thoroughly debunked .. and now you’re claiming it to be red herring, when you yourself brought it up. that’s a self ether.
i’ve proven to you in numerous threads how outrageous claiming anyone other than mizrahi jews as the originals is not only absolutely ludicrous, but has been extensively debunked through gene testing as well …..
you simply aren’t willing to accept it, because you’re stuck in your nutty ideology .. just like black folks who claim
to be the original moors, the original native americans, and even the original chinese. it’s all based on black americans losing their african ancestry via slavery and latching onto other cultures to overcompensate.
with all of which i’ve put up, you continue to point to insanely inaccurate notions that have zero evidence to support it.
abusive:
--- Quote from: Sccit on July 17, 2022, 05:16:35 PM ---but you’re the one who brought up the “ish” talking point, which, once again, has been thoroughly debunked .. and now you’re claiming it to be red herring, when you yourself brought it up. that’s a self ether.
i’ve proven to you in numerous threads how outrageous claiming anyone other than mizrahi jews as the originals is not only absolutely ludicrous, but has been extensively debunked through gene testing as well …..
you simply aren’t willing to accept it, because you’re stuck in your nutty ideology .. just like black folks who claim
to be the original moors, the original native americans, and even the original chinese. it’s all based on black americans losing their african ancestry via slavery and latching onto other cultures to overcompensate.
with all of which i’ve put up, you continue to point to insanely inaccurate notions that have zero evidence to support it.
--- End quote ---
I brought up the ish thing in another context. you're trying to use it as proof you're a jew.
the premise of this thread stands. Anyone can see that you can't prove you have any relationship to biblical jews. :ohwell:
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version