Snoop Dogg LOSES 500K Followers—Is He CANCELLED?!

[BigThumps]

if u real then i aint hard to find .. u more the bakersfield type, no?


 

Hahaha, look at the whiteboy trying to act brave. Naw puto, I'm the South Central type. Santa Fe & Gage ese. Big Bad SS FLORENCIA X3 homie, we right here all day.

Maybe u not hard to find in Beverly Hills hahaha. Ain't nobody tryiing to go look for some lame square whiteboy from the internet hahahaha. Nobody gets points for beating up punks around this way haha. You probably call the pigs and rat anyway haha. But if you feeling wild and crazy, bring yo ass to South Central and we'll see wussup 

[BigThumps]

[Sccit]

Hahaha, look at the whiteboy trying to act brave. Naw puto, I'm the South Central type. Santa Fe & Gage ese. Big Bad SS FLORENCIA X3 homie, we right here all day.

Maybe u not hard to find in Beverly Hills hahaha. Ain't nobody tryiing to go look for some lame square whiteboy from the internet hahahaha. Nobody gets points for beating up punks around this way haha. You probably call the pigs and rat anyway haha. But if you feeling wild and crazy, bring yo ass to South Central and we'll see wussup 

if u scared go to temple.



let’s keep it a buck here, your trolling is weak homie .. gota step it up a notch.



your last alias on here was slightly more convincing.


you losin it champ. 

[Sccit]

 

[Safe+Sound]

Yes that's exactly what i'm saying.  It's been proven time and time again.  Also in sports.  Look at all the athletes who do horrendous things off the field, yet people still pay big money to watch them play.  How many actors/actresses do things in their personal lives and people still love their movies.

I just gave a personal example where I deliberately stopped supporting R-Kelly's work once I discovered he was a pedophile. That contradicts the idea that everyone inevitably looks the other way.

Could you clarify how that fits into your claim that it’s “proven time and time again” people always separate the art from the artist? Because if even one person (like me) changes their support due to moral concerns, it suggests your blanket statement needs more nuance. As I mentioned before, it might be true that many fans do overlook an artist’s wrongdoing - maybe that also includes you - but it clearly isn’t all fans, as my example shows.

[Safe+Sound]

Hahahahaha, he didn't even drop any names and you over here putting yourself on blast getting all butt-hurt. You sound like one of these lil keyboard warriors. I seen some of your posts on this shit - you got a big mouth homes. You ain't talkin like that to nobody on the street without picking up your teeth after hahaha.

You ain't read some of these other pages in here? Fuckin weirdos drinkin their own piss. Shiiiit, I dunno where the fuck u from but over this way, we all the way above that sick shit. Speak for yourself.

And why you talkin like you black - I seen your pic Osama haha. U ain't from the hood ese. Just some whiteboy with a beard on the internet tryin to act hard cause you kick it with a few black rappers haha.

I thought this forum was on some G shit cause it's all westside music... but it's kinda wack. All these posers and softies up in here ain't really from L.A. hiding in their mamma's basement talking shit haha. Weak.

Any problems, come to the block - we right here on Florence Ave 

Great first read. All excellent points. With a little extra polish, you could open your own private practice.

Admittedly, it is quite the task trying to take someone seriously who drinks their own urine.


P.S. Love the video and how it was shot. Great representation of the area.

[Safe+Sound]

Hahaha, that's right homes. I can relate. I used to bump R Kelly back in the day but I can't anymore - he killed it. Everything sounds weird now that he's aired out. Cho-Mos get handled in the joint. One of them C.O.'s gonna give him the unlock of a lifetime one of these days hahaha.

I ain't surprised - lots of weirdos in forums and online in general dogg. You ain't dropping no names but you got people coming out the woodwork all butt-hurt already haha, straight burning themselves. Shit, I just joined this one and seen a page where motherfuckers talking about drinkin their own piss, WTF. I'm better than that homes hahaha.

Not many solid motherfuckers around but hey, if a motherfucker can't draw the line somewhere, he ain't shit and don't stand for shit. I got more respect for the punk ass woods on that Nazi bullshit that keep it all the way real than for some fuckin punk who can't turn the page on some bullshit happening right in front of him. Snoop ain't shit. That fake ass crip takes money to go be his own DJ at a party with people who hate Mexicans and black people. And he's there kickin it with another lame who used to be a C.O.? Aw hell naw homie.

It is indeed amusing when people publicly volunteer themselves in response to comments that made no mention of anyone in particular. It indirectly validates the claims levied against them.

The morality crisis is real. It's essentially what everything boils down to once money is no longer a driving force. How one treats others who can do nothing for them is telling on both ends of the spectrum, which I think is a significant (and valid) part of the outrage. The entire scenario is riddled with an obscene level of contradictions.

[Sccit]

It is indeed amusing when people publicly volunteer themselves in response to comments that made no mention of anyone in particular. It indirectly validates the claims levied against them.

The morality crisis is real. It's essentially what everything boils down to once money is no longer a driving force. How one treats others who can do nothing for them is telling on both ends of the spectrum, which I think is a significant (and valid) part of the outrage. The entire scenario is riddled with an obscene level of contradictions.

he’s trolling you, you idiot

 


and me having the back of the forum members here by calling out your pretentious behavior has nothing to do with me


your dumbass is too stupid to see the difference between a real poster and a troll playing a character.. and then u have the nerve to question the collective intelligence of the entire forum. classic.

[Soopafly DPGC]

I just gave a personal example where I deliberately stopped supporting R-Kelly's work once I discovered he was a pedophile. That contradicts the idea that everyone inevitably looks the other way.

Could you clarify how that fits into your claim that it’s “proven time and time again” people always separate the art from the artist? Because if even one person (like me) changes their support due to moral concerns, it suggests your blanket statement needs more nuance. As I mentioned before, it might be true that many fans do overlook an artist’s wrongdoing - maybe that also includes you - but it clearly isn’t all fans, as my example shows.

I don't think anywhere i said "every single person".  There will always be outliers to something, which is why I didn't say "every single person".  Cool, you don't listen to R. Kelly anymore.  You still listen to Snoop who had a murder case, still listen to Dre who beat a woman, still listen to Eazy E who had 8 kids by 7 different women, still listen to plenty of other rappers who done bad things in their personal lives, drug charges, etc.  That's why it's gangster rap.  These people aren't saints in their personal lives, and that's fine.  Who Snoop Dogg performs a concert for is irrelevant to me. 

[Sccit]

I don't think anywhere i said "every single person".  There will always be outliers to something, which is why I didn't say "every single person".  Cool, you don't listen to R. Kelly anymore.  You still listen to Snoop who had a murder case, still listen to Dre who beat a woman, still listen to Eazy E who had 8 kids by 7 different women, still listen to plenty of other rappers who done bad things in their personal lives, drug charges, etc.  That's why it's gangster rap.  These people aren't saints in their personal lives, and that's fine.  Who Snoop Dogg performs a concert for is irrelevant to me.

snoop killed some immigrant, no biggie … but performing at a donald trump event, that’s where i draw the line!

[Safe+Sound]

I don't think anywhere i said "every single person".  There will always be outliers to something, which is why I didn't say "every single person".  Cool, you don't listen to R. Kelly anymore.  You still listen to Snoop who had a murder case, still listen to Dre who beat a woman, still listen to Eazy E who had 8 kids by 7 different women, still listen to plenty of other rappers who done bad things in their personal lives, drug charges, etc.  That's why it's gangster rap.  These people aren't saints in their personal lives, and that's fine.  Who Snoop Dogg performs a concert for is irrelevant to me.

Comparing child neglect or having many children to white supremacy or pedophilia is apples and oranges. Yes, all wrongdoing is serious, but different behaviors can strike at the core of someone’s moral or philosophical stance in different ways. For example, it’s one thing for Dr. Dre to admit past violence, show remorse, and personally work to change; it’s another for an entertainer to openly promote or align with racism (or exploit minors) in a way that completely contradicts their public image or stated beliefs.

The key issue I raised is about betraying core values and whether fans should keep supporting someone whose actions run counter to their own moral standards. Throwing out an array of different offenses without considering context can blur that crucial distinction.

In the end, it’s less about “gotcha” examples and more about why a particular behavior is intolerable to a fan. Some might draw the line at criminal activity against minors, some at racism or violence, some at total hypocrisy regarding an artist’s professed beliefs. Either way, it’s hard to lump them all together without understanding each case’s specifics—or the values of the fans involved.

[Soopafly DPGC]

Comparing child neglect or having many children to white supremacy or pedophilia is apples and oranges. Yes, all wrongdoing is serious, but different behaviors can strike at the core of someone’s moral or philosophical stance in different ways. For example, it’s one thing for Dr. Dre to admit past violence, show remorse, and personally work to change; it’s another for an entertainer to openly promote or align with racism (or exploit minors) in a way that completely contradicts their public image or stated beliefs.

The key issue I raised is about betraying core values and whether fans should keep supporting someone whose actions run counter to their own moral standards. Throwing out an array of different offenses without considering context can blur that crucial distinction.

In the end, it’s less about “gotcha” examples and more about why a particular behavior is intolerable to a fan. Some might draw the line at criminal activity against minors, some at racism or violence, some at total hypocrisy regarding an artist’s professed beliefs. Either way, it’s hard to lump them all together without understanding each case’s specifics—or the values of the fans involved.

Haha, if you think performing at an inauguration of a candidate you don’t endorse is worse than murder, woman abuse, animal abuse, and child neglect, i think you need to reexamine your moral values. 

[BJV]

Look I don’t like Trump but what I really hate is the woke mob. Whatever happened to difference of opinion, freedom of speech and political choices. You can’t try to simply cancel everybody you disagree with.

[HighEyeCue]

Comparing child neglect or having many children to white supremacy or pedophilia is apples and oranges. Yes, all wrongdoing is serious, but different behaviors can strike at the core of someone’s moral or philosophical stance in different ways. For example, it’s one thing for Dr. Dre to admit past violence, show remorse, and personally work to change; it’s another for an entertainer to openly promote or align with racism (or exploit minors) in a way that completely contradicts their public image or stated beliefs.

The key issue I raised is about betraying core values and whether fans should keep supporting someone whose actions run counter to their own moral standards. Throwing out an array of different offenses without considering context can blur that crucial distinction.

In the end, it’s less about “gotcha” examples and more about why a particular behavior is intolerable to a fan. Some might draw the line at criminal activity against minors, some at racism or violence, some at total hypocrisy regarding an artist’s professed beliefs. Either way, it’s hard to lump them all together without understanding each case’s specifics—or the values of the fans involved.

as far as I know Trump and his party are the ones with moral values

the far left has seemingly normalized pretty much any type of vile behavior

[Safe+Sound]

Haha, if you think performing at an inauguration of a candidate you don’t endorse is worse than murder, woman abuse, animal abuse, and child neglect, i think you need to reexamine your moral values.

   I don’t think anyone is claiming that performing at an pre-inaugural event is worse than murder, abuse, or neglect. Those are obviously far more severe. The issue is that performing for a politician—especially one with a well-documented history of racist actions—raises serious ethical questions about endorsing or lending credibility to that politician’s platform.

   For instance, Donald Trump has faced racism allegations going back to the 1970s, including but in no way limited to:

   1.   1973 Fair Housing lawsuit: Trump Management was sued by the DOJ for refusing to rent to Black tenants. Trump Management admitted to violating hr Fair Housing Act in court.
   2.   The 1989 Central Park Five ads: He took out full-page ads calling for the death penalty for five Black and Latino teenagers who were later exonerated. He continued to advocate.
   3.   Casino discrimination: Multiple testimonies and complaints about Black employees being removed from high-roller tables, plus an upheld discrimination penalty in 1992.
   4.   Offensive comments about Native Americans: Suggesting certain tribes weren’t “real Indians” due to their skin tone and lineage.

   No one is saying these issues equal murder or child abuse, but they do indicate a pattern of racist remarks and policies over decades. If an entertainer prides themselves on supporting social justice or equality, performing for a figure with this track record can undercut those principles. That’s where the moral concern lies—not comparing it to violent crime, but asking whether the performer’s actions align with what they claim to stand for... which is the entire point of the thread's topic.

   So yes, we can condemn murder, abuse, and also question the ethics of supporting or legitimizing someone who has a longstanding history of racist behavior. They’re different issues with different degrees of severity. Pointing out the contradiction is not the same as saying it’s a bigger deal than murder—it’s just asking for consistency between claimed values and public actions.