Author Topic: SNOOP DOGG - MISSIONARY (Official Discussion)  (Read 264679 times)

Sccit

Re: SNOOP DOGG - MISSIONARY (Official Discussion)
« Reply #4305 on: Today at 07:38:09 AM »
That was also my verdict and still is. The album sounds good from a distance on a high-quality, professional system. On my Adam Audio's in my studio, with a subwoofer and an acoustically treated room, it sounded good too. My problem was this: in the car, on my headphones, and on regular speakers it was a disappointment. The "high frequencies" are simply too loud and the mixes are very bright. Maybe this album really was intended to be produced for studios, Dolby Atmos systems, and big stages.
It just is what it is: The old Dr. Dre sound aesthetic still sounds fantastic on EVERY speaker and EVERY headphones.


it's called stadium music

when u blast it on high end stadium speakers at full volume, it maintains clarity

he started doing that with compton, but at least compton maintained some thickness to it ... missionary just went all in on the thin sonics, which doesn't sound good on a regular system unless u turn the bass way up and lower the treble.
« Last Edit: Today at 08:31:04 AM by Sccit »
 
The following users thanked this post: --Vance--, Marco

--Vance--

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1186
  • Thanked: 38 times
  • Karma: 354
  • DJ STR © STR RECORDS www.strrecords.com
Re: SNOOP DOGG - MISSIONARY (Official Discussion)
« Reply #4306 on: Today at 08:04:07 AM »

it's called stadium music

when u blast it on high end stadium speakers at full volume, it maintains clarity

he starting doing that with compton, but at least compton maintained some thickness to it ... missionary just went all in on the thin sonics, which doesn't sound good on a regular system unless u turn the bass way up and lower the treble.

Nonetheless SOMEONE should have told them to make a "normal" mix, too. I think they thought that's gonna be the "new sonics" everybody will like. Which definately isn't the case....