Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

What Other Team has the potential to beat the lakers?

<< < (5/6) > >>

Perfection:

--- Quote from: The Big Bad Ass on July 20, 2003, 07:13:29 PM ---
--- Quote from: The French Dibbler on July 20, 2003, 05:47:14 PM ---
--- Quote from: Represent. on July 20, 2003, 04:37:48 PM ---
--- Quote from: KING VerbalAssaulta on July 19, 2003, 06:08:12 PM ---PACERS...they'll be the team to beat this year...mark that down gentlemen and not who said it...bender and harrington had a year to develop...they just need to find a damn point and they'll be set

and i think the nets with a healthy alonzo mourning could beat them too

--- End quote ---
yes, I agree.....But these two teams only have a CHANCE to beat the Lakers.  Everyone else will be destroyed.

--- End quote ---

Pacers have no chance because like always they'll choke in the second half of the season and barely make the playoffs. Thomas isn't a good coach. The Pistons  have a better chance of beatting a team in the west then the Pacers do because the Pistons don't choke during the season and they have a coach who knows what he is doing.

The Pacers are going no where as long as Thomas is there coach.

--- End quote ---

pacers choked last year in the second half, but not the year before. I don't know what pacers team you watched lol. Thomas will be gone first of the season. THe only reason they kept his was to resign JO.

--- End quote ---

They choked last year and the year before that they blew up in the second half and didn't make the playoffs. I don't know what Pacer team you're watching.
O'Neil was resigned before Byrd got there (O'Neil resigned with the Pacers because he wasn't going to get the ball as much if he went somewhere else, it had nothing to do with Thomas), now that Byrd is there Thomas will be fired becuase Thomas and Byrd just don't like each other.

Perfection:

--- Quote from: Scorpion on July 20, 2003, 06:12:41 PM ---
--- Quote from: The French Dibbler on July 20, 2003, 04:06:32 PM ---But the Charlotte Bobcats are named after the owner. I think the name Charlotte Flight would've been better because that's what Carolina is known for, being the first in flight.

--- End quote ---

Well, it doesn't really matter now, we'll all get used to it eventually and nobody will even care what the team's called.  Like the Raptors, wtf?  The lakers?  Huh?  We still like them even though their names are crap.  

--- End quote ---

Remember The Lakers used to be in Minnesota, and Minnesota has more lakes then any other state in the USA. The why the name Lakers much like The Jazz used to be in New Orleans and New Orleans is known for their jazz, so New Orleans Jazz. When these 2 teams moved they didn't think to change the name to something that reflects LA or Utah in anyway.

The people up here in Toronto think that Raptors is a great name because it's orginal.

The Big Bad Ass:
the year before that, they didn't choke. They traded for Ron, Miller, Ollie, and Mercer, and played the exact same way they did in the first half. They remained 500 the whole year. No blowing up what so ever. I watched every single game that year. I don't know what the hell you are talking about.

blacksmoke:
maybe newjersey but i doubt it

lakers are taking over

Perfection:

--- Quote from: The Big Bad Ass on July 20, 2003, 08:48:40 PM ---the year before that, they didn't choke. They traded for Ron, Miller, Ollie, and Mercer, and played the exact same way they did in the first half. They remained 500 the whole year. No blowing up what so ever. I watched every single game that year. I don't know what the hell you are talking about.

--- End quote ---

Well then the Pacers must have sucked because the Raptors lost something like 15 in a row, and the Pacers still didn't make the playoffs. So they did suck in the second half, if they still can't catch a team that lost 15 in a row.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version