Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Karl Malone In the Lakers
Juice:
--- Quote ---nobody is qualified to start over Malone
--- End quote ---
kuniver:
--- Quote ---we'll see next year...and than youll remember Sccit was the first one too tell yall, and youll regret not beliving me...
Why wouldnt they pic him up? He was probably a free agent and he didnt want to end his career without a ring, so he decided "where should I go? hmm, I know...The greatest team in NBA history...the Lakers. Now I can finally get a ring and retire in peace"...I mean the Lakers do need a Power Forward, and if they dont, they'll just keep him as a back-up like they did with Mitch Richmond (which I highly doubt since nobody is qualified to start over Malone)...
--- End quote ---
Utah has the talent to get a ring, they just dont do it, they went all the way in 97' and fell short.. plus, i doubt Karl Malone will go to the damn lakers, shit, take SHAQ from the lakers and no more rings.. LAKERS BEST TEAM IN NBA HISTORY???? i think not, if any team its the Boston Celtics or the Chicago Bulls
Juice:
--- Quote ---LAKERS BEST TEAM IN NBA HISTORY???? i think not, if any team its the Boston Celtics or the Chicago Bulls
--- End quote ---
Those things are ridicule. For sure "new" players are better than players of the past. Look at.. i dont know... 100 meters run. Today's runners are better than past runners. But that's normal. It will always be like that. Always better, always more close to perfection. About basketball, a 18 years old of today can be better than a veteran of 30 years ago (Kobe at 23 is 300x better than Michael Jordan at 23).
So how can you compare Celtics of 60-70 to the Lakers of 2002? I mean.. that's not possible. It's not possible to compare Shaq with Russell. Big Shaq today against the Russell of several years ago = no contest. Tecnical KO after 2 mins. Slam after slam.
So you cant really compare 2 teams who played in 2 different era's, IMO. Bulls vs those Lakers? Shaq vs Wennington? Or today's Kobe vs Jordan. You cant do it, man.
CELTICS ruled. BULLS ruled. LAKERS ruled. And now they rules again. Simple as that.
kuniver:
--- Quote ---Those things are ridicule. For sure "new" players are better than players of the past. Look at.. i dont know... 100 meters run. Today's runners are better than past runners. But that's normal. It will always be like that. Always better, always more close to perfection. About basketball, a 18 years old of today can be better than a veteran of 30 years ago (Kobe at 23 is 300x better than Michael Jordan at 23).
So how can you compare Celtics of 60-70 to the Lakers of 2002? I mean.. that's not possible. It's not possible to compare Shaq with Russell. Big Shaq today against the Russell of several years ago = no contest. Tecnical KO after 2 mins. Slam after slam.
So you cant really compare 2 teams who played in 2 different era's, IMO. Bulls vs those Lakers? Shaq vs Wennington? Or today's Kobe vs Jordan. You cant do it, man.
CELTICS ruled. BULLS ruled. LAKERS ruled. And now they rules again. Simple as that.
--- End quote ---
There was more competition back then, then there was now... just ask Charles Barkely, besides how can you even compare Jordan to Kobe when Kobe took Jordan's game?
01-02 LAL, 25.2 PPG.. KOBE is 23 now
86-87 CHI, 37.1 PPG.. When JORDAN was 23
Lakers werent winning championships without PHIL JACKSON...
'92 Bulls vs '02 Lakers, '92 Bulls by a landslide
Juice:
--- Quote ---
There was more competition back then, then there was now... just ask Charles Barkely, besides how can you even compare Jordan to Kobe when Kobe took Jordan's game?
01-02 LAL, 25.2 PPG.. KOBE is 23 now
86-87 CHI, 37.1 PPG.. When JORDAN was 23
Lakers werent winning championships without PHIL JACKSON...
'92 Bulls vs '02 Lakers, '92 Bulls by a landslide
--- End quote ---
Naw man.. points doesnt mean a thing! Cut O'Neal from Lakers and Kobe was the best scorer of the last 3 seasons with 40 points a game! It's all about having the winning mentality! Jordan didnt have it as a rookie, 23. Kobe got it now, with 3 titles. It's not that Phil Jackson wins the game alone. He helps the team having the right attitude and mentality.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version