Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Kashmir: the much ignored issue
ONETIME:
--- Quote from: Eidolon_Sun on September 07, 2003, 08:39:50 AM ---
--- Quote ---
India is pretty much controlling its population.. and the reason the population of pakistan is LOW is becuz - its have a very high Mortality rate... and the govt. doesn't have money even to provide health care to its ppl. and u expect India to send its citizens to such a underpoverished nation whose main aim is to topple existing govt.s, harbor terrorists and create a fundamentalist muslim state????
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
how r u controlling ur population ??? where people dont even kno the meaning of a condom ???? and as for health care, there are alot of Hospitals tht offer free treatment, as the biggest example is the SHAUKAT-KAHANAM CANCER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, biggest hospital in the south-east asia and 3rd biggest in the whole asia, it provides free treatment to the poor not only for cancer, but for all other deseases. Queen Elizabeth gave this hospital the award for the best free treatment and largest hospital in south-east asia. Do you have any proof of pakistan harboring terrorists ????? it shud be a good thing to send the Muslims to Pakistan from india as u think tht Muslims r terrorists, u wanna get rid of terrorists rite ?????
ONETIME:
--- Quote from: Eidolon_Sun on September 07, 2003, 08:39:50 AM ---
also for ur information at the start of 2000, Pakistan suffered three disadvantages vis-à-vis India. The growth rate of the Indian economy in the 1990s was 6.1 per cent against 4 per cent for Pakistan, according to the World Development Report. Pakistan's low growth rate can be attributed to poor record of governance in the Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif regimes. In 2000, Pakistan was suffering from the economic `mis'governance of the past decade.
Pakistan, much smaller than India, spends a higher share of its national income on Defence. India's GDP was $442 billion in 1999 against $64 billion for Pakistan. India spent 2.8 per cent of its GDP on defence against Pakistan's 5.7 per cent. In 2000, Pakistan was affected by a drought while India had a normal monsoon. The growth rate of agriculture in Pakistan was (-) 2.5 per cent in 2001, down from a positive growth of 6.5 per cent in 2000. Indian agriculture's growth rate increased to 5.7 per cent in 2001 from (-) 0.2 per cent in 2000 due to normal rains.
Thus, Pakistan suffered from three disadvantages: It had gone through a decade of democratic bad governance, a drought, and spent a greater portion of its income on Defence. One would have expected Pakistan's economic situation to deteriorate in 2001 in comparison to India. But the Asian Development Outlook, published by the Asian Development Bank, gives us the exact opposite picture.
Am I justified?? 8)
--- End quote ---
No, Pakistan's growth rate was not suffering from any of tht bullshit.
Even though pakistan is much smaller than India it has still prooved tht the defence system is better than india with a small amount of Army and half the military equipment of India. How can you we spend more on Military than you ?? when Pakistan has 25 Atomic warheads and india got more than 50 ? When our number of fighter jet planes is much lesser than ur country u still say we spend more on our military ? when we havent spent any money on making OUR OWN FIGHTER JET PLANES, India spent a huge amount of money to make a fighter Jet plane which is not tht good and is still in improving stages, all tht money could've been spent on condoms to distribue within the poor people.
Once again NO, our great portion of income does not goes on Military, and once again ill tell u NO, our economy has upgraded in 2001, in 1999 1 Indian ruppe was 1.23 pakistan rupees, now 1 Indian rupee is equal to 1.02 Pakistani Rupee.
Are you justified ? NO
Eidolon_Ravi:
--- Quote ---Do you have any proof of pakistan harboring terrorists ?? it shud be a good thing to send the Muslims to Pakistan from india as u think tht Muslims r terrorists, u wanna get rid of terrorists rite ??
--- End quote ---
This is really funny strite BS... ;D Okay so ur now talking like those dumbass politicians in Pak.... The US whom the Pak so feverently hoped will mediate has itseld acknowledged that the Pak destroy the camps it runs to train terrorists....
and Mr Mussharraf imself has said that unless india hands over kashmir over to pak there's little he can do about the terrorist organisations..
Go to any damn news site aand check out the poll... more than 50% pakistanis AND Indians support resolving the Kashmir issue as prima facie to stabilise the relationships... I don't have anything against the pakistanis.. I hate terrorism in a nation which houses such rich cultural heritage and whose ppl. are so tolerant of all religions...
--- Quote ---is it a big deal to allow them to go for Hajj more thn million muslims go for Haj to the gulf from other non-muslim countries
--- End quote ---
the point to be made was that india is not averse to restrict its citizens on the grounds of religion.. it is one of the nations in the world whch offers its citizens *freedom of religion* and *freedom of movement* regardlesss of their religion...
ONETIME:
--- Quote from: Eidolon_Sun on September 07, 2003, 11:03:19 AM ---
--- Quote ---Do you have any proof of pakistan harboring terrorists ?? it shud be a good thing to send the Muslims to Pakistan from india as u think tht Muslims r terrorists, u wanna get rid of terrorists rite ??
--- End quote ---
This is really funny strite BS... ;D Okay so ur now talking like those dumbass politicians in Pak.... The US whom the Pak so feverently hoped will mediate has itseld acknowledged that the Pak destroy the camps it runs to train terrorists....
and Mr Mussharraf imself has said that unless india hands over kashmir over to pak there's little he can do about the terrorist organisations..
Go to any damn news site aand check out the poll... more than 50% pakistanis AND Indians support resolving the Kashmir issue as prima facie to stabilise the relationships... I don't have anything against the pakistanis.. I hate terrorism in a nation which houses such rich cultural heritage and whose ppl. are so tolerant of all religions...
--- Quote ---is it a big deal to allow them to go for Hajj more thn million muslims go for Haj to the gulf from other non-muslim countries
--- End quote ---
the point to be made was that india is not averse to restrict its citizens on the grounds of religion.. it is one of the nations in the world whch offers its citizens *freedom of religion* and *freedom of movement* regardlesss of their religion...
--- End quote ---
oh really ? than why didnt pakistan get attacked for trainining terrorists??? if u actually look @ ur statement again, pakistani politicans r way smarter than Indian politicans, a small amount amount of ppl. made a big nation like INDIA to split into 2, the 2nd half was Pakistan. Wheres the proof tht pakistan said they destroyed terrorist camps ?? no they didnt, U.S actually asked for help from Pakistan to help them in Afghanistan because the the province of NWFP has the same geo. as Afghanistan, and the men in PAKI ARMY of NWFP were born in tht area, so the army in tht province has all kind of strategies and tactics wht to do in a war with support of deep mountains and etc. Pakistan refused to help until U.S gave them the promised f-16's, the deal is still going, but is not yet confirmed.
did i tell you how pathetic you are ?
Eidolon_Ravi:
^^^ Lmao @ that...
man how can u be so blind towards history?!!!!!
PAKISTAN got attacked twice and got defeated twice... wars of 1971 being the major ofthe two... India was instrumantal in giving Bangladesh its freedom from the atrocities of pakistani leaders..... hahaha ur really funny... ;D
And seems ur such a kid that u don't even seem to know that *US friendship with Pakistan was just a Alliance of convenience* us needed Pak territory to attack Afgan.. and pak got handsomely paid for it.... Ans pak is such a sissy that it requires US mediation to face India!!!
Seems u never read the papers and see the current news and u go arnd making such dumb atatements.. where I have already made so many statements regarding the feasibility of Kashmir joining India...
And I again reiterate that Pak is incapable of Handling Kashmir becuz:
* I doesn't have a stable Government in Itself
* It is not a religiously tolerant state
* It is economically more weaker than India *look @ states like Baluchistan*.. shit I feel sorry for the ppl livin there...
* It has made use of wrong means to get Kashmir like harboring terrorists and thwarting India's initiatives to normalize relations...
I know I have justified.... * No need for further justification*
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version