Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Bush
M Dogg™:
--- Quote from: King Tech Quadafi on December 16, 2003, 05:59:49 PM ---^ Yes. Thats why 18 Italians servicemen took a bullet for Bush in Baghdad.
--- End quote ---
Remember Tech, a bullet for Bush, is a bullet for the betterment of the world.
King Tech Quadafi:
--- Quote from: M Dogg on December 16, 2003, 06:04:38 PM ---
--- Quote from: King Tech Quadafi on December 16, 2003, 05:59:49 PM ---^ Yes. Thats why 18 Italians servicemen took a bullet for Bush in Baghdad.
--- End quote ---
Remember Tech, a bullet for Bush, is a bullet for the betterment of the world.
--- End quote ---
How could I forget?
*smacks head*
Smoke:
--- Quote from: King Tech Quadafi on December 16, 2003, 05:59:49 PM ---^ Yes. Thats why 18 Italians servicemen took a bullet for Bush in Baghdad.
--- End quote ---
Man please. Bush didnt send our men to war. We did. Our Parliament did. And we went there with doctors, Red Cross, and police (servicemen), to do what we do since the WWII (for example in Albania, in Somalia, in ex-Jugoslavia). International Red Cross went away from Iraq like cowards? We didnt, our Red Cross is the only one still helping Iraq. We helped Iraqi people, and they cryed with us for the deaths of our men (something so deep you cant even immagine!). So please, for the honor of those men, dont reduce it to "18 Italians servicemen took a bullet for Bush in Baghdad". That's a blasphemy. And i'm sure you are more intelligent than this. Expecially if you talking about something maybe you dont know well.
P.S. It wasnt been Saddam or Saddam's soldiers to kill our men, but Al Quaeda. Do you know the difference?
M Dogg™:
--- Quote from: .:ImC:. on December 16, 2003, 06:17:11 PM ---
--- Quote from: King Tech Quadafi on December 16, 2003, 05:59:49 PM ---^ Yes. Thats why 18 Italians servicemen took a bullet for Bush in Baghdad.
--- End quote ---
P.S. It wasnt been Saddam or Saddam's soldiers to kill our men, but Al Quaeda. Do you know the difference?
--- End quote ---
Actually that's what I've heard. And since Saddam didn't have tons of guards, I truly question how much power he has. I'm telling you, the war on Saddam is good, because Saddam killed over 800,000 Iraqis, but at the sametime, almost usless because Saddam really has no clout in the Middle East, and he had no weapons, which was the reason we went in the first place. It seems like Saddam was on his own, and hunting him out was almost usless. And I do think Italy is good for sending their Red Cross there, because people need Medical, not military help. We shall see what happens in the future.
Smoke:
--- Quote from: M Dogg on December 16, 2003, 06:22:36 PM ---
--- Quote from: .:ImC:. on December 16, 2003, 06:17:11 PM ---
--- Quote from: King Tech Quadafi on December 16, 2003, 05:59:49 PM ---^ Yes. Thats why 18 Italians servicemen took a bullet for Bush in Baghdad.
--- End quote ---
P.S. It wasnt been Saddam or Saddam's soldiers to kill our men, but Al Quaeda. Do you know the difference?
--- End quote ---
Actually that's what I've heard. And since Saddam didn't have tons of guards, I truly question how much power he has. I'm telling you, the war on Saddam is good, because Saddam killed over 800,000 Iraqis, but at the sametime, almost usless because Saddam really has no clout in the Middle East, and he had no weapons, which was the reason we went in the first place. It seems like Saddam was on his own, and hunting him out was almost usless. And I do think Italy is good for sending their Red Cross there, because people need Medical, not military help. We shall see what happens in the future.
--- End quote ---
Yeah actually we've killed 0 Iraqis. But we've saved thousands of them. So we AINT FIGHTING A WAR. AND THE MOST IMPORTANT THING WE AINT DOING IT FOR BUSH, BUT TO REPLACE THE COWARD INTL. RED CROSS AND O.N.U., WHO RUNNED AWAY.
Still we've supported Bush, but LOGISTICALLY. Like dozen of Nations.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version