Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Why arent more Americans in an uproar over their govt straight lying to them??
Jay ay Beee:
--- Quote from: Ronnie on February 09, 2004, 07:01:25 AM ---the U.N. said that this man had weapons of mass destruction
--- End quote ---
I thin you'll find that Hans Blix along with France and Germany asked for more time to find the weapons before going to war.
King Tech Quadafi:
--- Quote from: Ronnie on February 09, 2004, 07:01:25 AM ---I assume you're talking about the weapons of mass destruction. I think most of america honestly believes they weren't lied to.
Look at it: Before the war, not only did Bush say there were weapons of mass destruction, but The U.N. said the same thing, England said the same thing, President Clinton said the same thing, nearly every senator, republican or democrat, passed a resolution saying the same thing, John fucking KERRY said the same thing, I mean; if Bush was lying about it, every body else was too.
So it's obviously not an outright lie, at worst it's bad intelligence. I know you hate George Bush, but you have to admit, when everyone from Bill Clinton to the U.N. said that this man had weapons of mass destruction, as much as you hate him, you can't pin it on George Bush.
The second part of it is, most of America hated Saddam Hussein anyways. Most of us felt cheated when he wasn't killed during the first gulf war, so I think most people don't give a shit how it was done, they're just happy it was done.
Third, I think many americans feel safer with George Bush in office. It's pretty common knowledge that a Democratic president wouldn't have done shit after 9/11, and we would be even more succeptable to terror attacks. At least Bush did something. Kerry would have apologized for offending the world, and gave them money for repartations or something.
Fourth, it is a pretty sad bunch of democratic hopefulls this year. Even if I didn't want to vote for Bush, who would I vote for?
--- End quote ---
See this is why I have no respect for Republicans. You are so used to being force fed lies, you are conditioned to lie yourself. There was absolutely no WMD. The UN said this, the French intelligence said this, Scott Ritter openly said this. The Democrats didnt say shit because they didnt wanted to be Dixie Chicked. Now AFTER THE WAR HAS ALREADY BEGUN AND THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION BUT TO STAY do you have Democrats sayin stuff. Further proof the whole bloody thing is a sham. Kerry disgusts me, this guy was all gung ho about the war, now he wants to criticize Bush over it, and hes gonna pick some stupid little point (post war reconstruction) to do it over.
Primo:
If u were in america u would notice that bushs popularity is going down fast
Don Jacob:
--- Quote from: King Tech Quadafi on February 09, 2004, 09:47:25 AM ---
--- Quote from: Ronnie on February 09, 2004, 07:01:25 AM ---I assume you're talking about the weapons of mass destruction. I think most of america honestly believes they weren't lied to.
Look at it: Before the war, not only did Bush say there were weapons of mass destruction, but The U.N. said the same thing, England said the same thing, President Clinton said the same thing, nearly every senator, republican or democrat, passed a resolution saying the same thing, John fucking KERRY said the same thing, I mean; if Bush was lying about it, every body else was too.
So it's obviously not an outright lie, at worst it's bad intelligence. I know you hate George Bush, but you have to admit, when everyone from Bill Clinton to the U.N. said that this man had weapons of mass destruction, as much as you hate him, you can't pin it on George Bush.
The second part of it is, most of America hated Saddam Hussein anyways. Most of us felt cheated when he wasn't killed during the first gulf war, so I think most people don't give a shit how it was done, they're just happy it was done.
Third, I think many americans feel safer with George Bush in office. It's pretty common knowledge that a Democratic president wouldn't have done shit after 9/11, and we would be even more succeptable to terror attacks. At least Bush did something. Kerry would have apologized for offending the world, and gave them money for repartations or something.
Fourth, it is a pretty sad bunch of democratic hopefulls this year. Even if I didn't want to vote for Bush, who would I vote for?
--- End quote ---
There was absolutely no WMD. The UN said this, the French intelligence said this
--- End quote ---
uuuuuuh no.
Don Rizzle:
--- Quote from: King Tech Quadafi on February 09, 2004, 09:47:25 AM ---
--- Quote from: Ronnie on February 09, 2004, 07:01:25 AM ---I assume you're talking about the weapons of mass destruction. I think most of america honestly believes they weren't lied to.
Look at it: Before the war, not only did Bush say there were weapons of mass destruction, but The U.N. said the same thing, England said the same thing, President Clinton said the same thing, nearly every senator, republican or democrat, passed a resolution saying the same thing, John fucking KERRY said the same thing, I mean; if Bush was lying about it, every body else was too.
So it's obviously not an outright lie, at worst it's bad intelligence. I know you hate George Bush, but you have to admit, when everyone from Bill Clinton to the U.N. said that this man had weapons of mass destruction, as much as you hate him, you can't pin it on George Bush.
The second part of it is, most of America hated Saddam Hussein anyways. Most of us felt cheated when he wasn't killed during the first gulf war, so I think most people don't give a shit how it was done, they're just happy it was done.
Third, I think many americans feel safer with George Bush in office. It's pretty common knowledge that a Democratic president wouldn't have done shit after 9/11, and we would be even more succeptable to terror attacks. At least Bush did something. Kerry would have apologized for offending the world, and gave them money for repartations or something.
Fourth, it is a pretty sad bunch of democratic hopefulls this year. Even if I didn't want to vote for Bush, who would I vote for?
--- End quote ---
See this is why I have no respect for Republicans. You are so used to being force fed lies, you are conditioned to lie yourself. There was absolutely no WMD. The UN said this, the French intelligence said this, Scott Ritter openly said this. The Democrats didnt say shit because they didnt wanted to be Dixie Chicked. Now AFTER THE WAR HAS ALREADY BEGUN AND THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION BUT TO STAY do you have Democrats sayin stuff. Further proof the whole bloody thing is a sham. Kerry disgusts me, this guy was all gung ho about the war, now he wants to criticize Bush over it, and hes gonna pick some stupid little point (post war reconstruction) to do it over.
--- End quote ---
yea but the golden rule in politics is that the point of the opposition is to appose
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version