Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Sharons party rejects concept of Palestinian state
King Tech Quadafi:
exactly my brother
i think suicide bombing is such a waste of young palestinians , future doctors and engineers, but i understand the frustration and desperation of them, due to the oppressed lives they are living,
i am in favour of peaceful negotiations, but armed resistance is needed if your life is being threatened
i dont want the death of Israel, i dont want to "drive the jews into the sea", i want 2 states living side by side, independant, not run by one another,
i want Jersualem, shared by Israeli Jews, and Palestinian muslims/christains,
i want a palestinian state in the west bank and gaza, and i want all those settlements in gaza and the west bank as well as the one in E. Jerusalem
peace
infinite59:
--- Quote ---and they say sharon is a man of peace, what kinda shit is that? how the fuck are they gonna have peace when they wont let palestine have its own state, this shits just goin in circles
--- End quote ---
I think bottom line is that Sharon represents the mindstate of alot of people, that Muslims are second rate citizens, with a second rate religion, and that their lifes are expendable.
I TO DA GEEZY:
what tha LIKUDs majority"s vote meant was...that wit this
type of a leadership(terrorism supporting) of the
autonomy....there is no way a Palestinian state can exist....
all that it is...
imagine this, if a palestinian state starts it"z existing, let"s
say tommorow, this is going to be a state that supports
terrorism...will have tha ability to contact, Syria,Iraq,Iran etc
(since it"s a state this won"t be tha regular contact it might
have had by now....but in weapon trade deals, formal
ones)....with the intention to destroy Israel...i don"t think
that many of tha pro palestinian peepz here remember what
Arfat said shortly after sIgning tha Oslo agreement...it was
somethin like this: "since we can'T defeat Israel in a phisical
WAR, this agreement is going be used to reach a higher
posision of effect on Israel....and is going to be a multi-
leveled tactic to bring Israel to distruction while using the
political force that will be given to us(due to the agreement)
along with power actions against Israel at tha same time
(terroristic actions for tha hard getters:))"....now you tell
me...how can someone, someone who has tha plan of
destroying Israel, calls millions of Shahids to come to
Jerusalem...and payes\phisiclly supports, terroristic actions
while simultanuaslly enjoying the political strength that was
given to him by formal agreements, how can this someone
be a leader of a state... ?....and even if it wasn"t him...there
is no alternative that is completelly oposite to arafat in his
ways right now....this state will mean to Israel and to the
world a new Iraq,Iran etc...you have to be kidden" not to
realise that if Arafat really wanted a state he would have it
long time ago as well(the last camp david agreement, for
example)...so in fact he doesn"t even want a state as long as
Israel exists by it"s side....
i saw how some people say sharon has much more to be
blamed for...loughable(no offence) after this Itifaada...and
tha most generous offer ever...i dont know how anyone could
blame sharon for anythang besides trying to protect his
state from distruction(btw...alow me to remind you that
sharon presented the pro palestinian state side on LIKUDs
debate yesterday)....so i really don"t get what some of the
people r saying here....it"s like blaming Bush for bombing
Afgan after september 11th...and don"t forget we had many
years of september 11th"z here in Israel.
TheSheriff:
No-one can blame Sharon for Arafat rejecting Barak's deal. The problem is this, for both sides.
Neither side has a charismatic enough leader to make them follow his decision in the name of peace. Arafat had to reject Barak, because his PLA wanted 100% rather than 98%.
Sharon wants peace, this has been a humiliation for him...Netanyahu is opposing his leadership, etc. Funny how their positions have changed. When Netanyahu was in power, he was a moderate. Israel need a Golda Meir, or a Yitzak Rabin (who had a 75% approval rating a week before his death)...Palestine need a Kussim, or a Idrat.
Oh, one other thing, on the Gaza Strip-and Golan heights-is that Israel occupied them for strategic reasons. Without them, Israel is under extreme military pressure from Syria in the Golan...Also, think about this. Israel started off its life as several enclaves, and had to go to war to survive, and form a consistent frontier. If Palestine had one little chunk around Rafah and Gaza, and the larger chunk round the West Bank, they'll be strategically crippled. They'll have to garrison Gaza with no means of supply if Egypt gets pissed with them.
Oh, by the way, Jordan oppressed the Palestinian people in the West Bank, annexing it in 1959-officially, at least. Jordan should suck as many balls as anyone for the situation, in that now they hypocritically support Palestine, as a way of opposing Israel.
King Tech Quadafi:
yeah for sure, Owen u spittin truth again
fuckin Jordan damn near walked out of this mess and frontin like their hands are clean.......
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version