Lifestyle > Train of Thought

Tech breaks down some concepts used by the US govt to fool its people Vol. 1

(1/6) > >>

King Tech Quadafi:
example one

"iraq has not accounted for its weapons"

Bush speak: This leads one to believe Saddam has his finger on the big red button.

Tech responds: This means that the weapons have not been accounted for, on paper, by international experts. This fact on its own can be twisted very easily, basically think of it as circumstantial evidence. What does this statement really mean.

Any one with knowledge of Saddams weapons programs knows several things as facts:

1. Saddam was close to a nuke, until the Israeli missle strike in 1981.
2. Saddam in the 80s had weapons (no nukes, he never had nukes) of chemical and bioligical substances (lets ignore where the funds and technology came from guys....wink wink)

However, if one utilizes the common sense which God has blessed some individuals with, one will look at the events of the 90s.

1. The Gulf War. After this war, Iraq went from the most developed country in the Middle East to one of its poorest. Its armed forces went from 5th strongest in the world to a rag tag army of conscripts surrendering to Britsh camera crews. Saddam essentially was the "Mayor of Baghdad" (love the quote, got it from some dude on sohh.com)

2. 10 Years of air sorties enforcing the no fly zones. As well as the missle strikes launched by Clinton in 98 (?).

3. US/UN sanctions impoverished this country Iraq. WMD do not cost a couple of dollars you know.

So lets add this shit up

Major conflict + 10 years of military strikes + years of Inspection + air strikes campaign= nothing left but kababs and desert dust boys.

No matter what kind of information is put forward, logically and rationally speaking, there was no realistic and serious pursuit of weapons post Guilf War because the country was in no position to arm and develop them. SO the question is thenn did Saddam still have the weapons US helped him develop in the 80s. Add the fact that chemical/biological weaponry has a shelf life of 3-5 years, and what do you have? A couple bins of old mustard gas gathering rust in some dink hole in Baghdad.

smerlus:
if iraq was so poor why did the raid that caught sadaam also net $750,000 all in $100 dollar bills?

just because the people of iraq are poor doesn't mean the dictator of iraq was poor...


move bill gates to ethiopia...the country will still be in poverty but does that mean bill gates couldn't buy chemical weapons?

like you said...common sense

Don Jacob:
there was a headline on my homepage when i got online yesturday, troops find  millions of saddam's dollars.


iraq poor-yes
saddam poor-no

Trauma-san:
So let me get this straight.  I totally fuck up your entire argument, by breaking it down to quotes and your own hypocricy, and you abandon that thread and move on.  It's actually a good idea, but you can't expect me to read this shit before I reply this post to it :)  

King Tech Quadafi:

--- Quote from: Ronnie on February 11, 2004, 04:33:15 PM ---So let me get this straight.  I totally fuck up your entire argument, by breaking it down to quotes and your own hypocricy, and you abandon that thread and move on.  It's actually a good idea, but you can't expect me to read this shit before I reply this post to it :)  

--- End quote ---

How did you fuck up my argument? Good God, my IQ has dropped 20 points just talkin to you. Do me a favour ok, go into that last thread, and identify what the extent of my post was, what my main argument was, then post it here. Thank you. You have no fuckin clue what youre talkin about. Your quotes were completely irrelevent, it served no purpose, and proved me right.

back to the thread....money trasfer and the funding of arnaments is not a simple matter of withdrawing from an ATM, you need money for the planning, material, building, if these things existed they would have been found.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page