Poll

Which Chronic was the best

Dr Dre's Chronic
42 (87.5%)
Deathrow's Chronic
6 (12.5%)

Total Members Voted: 41

  

Author Topic: Chronic 2000 V Chronic 2001  (Read 698 times)

Mick a/k/a Mickaveli_#1

  • Muthafuckin' OG
  • ***
  • Posts: 289
  • Karma: -17
  • Greenleaf
Re:Chronic 2000 V Chronic 2001
« Reply #30 on: February 19, 2004, 11:54:37 PM »
Chronic 2001 -->

Good Points: Brilliant album. Brought Dre back to the #1 spot and had the attention from others in the game with this release. Brought in a bunch of new acts to work on the project and label, seemed to listen to what the public wanted to hear - massive improvement from the aftermath compilation. Kept the flow of the album, was consistent in order etc. Skits (although loved by few hated by many) seemed to fit in well in the right places. A brillaintly made album with many star tracks

Bad Points: Not a lot in variation of production. 90% of the tracks had the same drum pattern, or bass line.

Chronic 2000 --> Good Points: Very big mixture in talent, young fresh acts, older acts like scarface, dpg clique, classic 2pac, & r&b all on one album. Easy distinction in change of production, had a mixture of different beats of many different styles. Perhaps the last original sounding Death Row Cd to ever be released from the label.

Bad Points: slight skits where they are not needed, a few tracks shouldnt have been on there like realest & top dogg's they wanna be like us. Tha Realest shouldn't have got so many of his tracks put on the album (although Top Dogg's We Don't luv em was dope) but a few notches and this could have been a really hot album rather than just warm.

Vote: Chronic 2000  ;D
 

AlerG

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 6028
  • Karma: 363
Re:Chronic 2000 V Chronic 2001
« Reply #31 on: February 20, 2004, 12:48:47 AM »
i can't believe anybody voted for chronic 2000
the guy above me made a review for 2001 sound better and still voted for 2000, slap yourself...

2000 had alot of dope tracks on it but it wasn't fucken with 2001

i remember when 2000 came out it said new tracks by dr.dre and snoop and since that was false advertising you were aloud to bring the album back and get a full refund, i know alot of people who burned it and brought it back too, lol...i actually kept mine though cause i still thought it was pretty hot, peace.
Our music video which was featured in the motion picture Scary Movie 5 :

http://youtube.com/watch?v=7jwCyr0A2x0
 

Conan

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2057
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • Karma: 123
  • "Holler at your Uncle Snoopy..."
Re:Chronic 2000 V Chronic 2001
« Reply #32 on: February 20, 2004, 10:13:24 AM »
'Chronic 2000' was just another pathetic attempt by Suge to eat off of one of his former artists. Come on now, it was obvious he was trying to market that compilation as a new Dre record. After all, its all in the name...

'Chronic 2001' (the REAL follow-up) wins this contest hands down. It didn't have much competition, but it helps that it was also a damn good album.
"Shit ain't all peaches and cream, and I ain't Sara Lee, bitch!" - Lloyd Banks

"I'm Morpheus in this Hip-Hop Matrix, exposing fake shit." - Common

"With consecutive platinum hits, I up my status. Ain't no more Calvin Broadus!" - Snoop

"Look at all these conscious rappers - guess who influenced them?" - KRS One