Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Gay weddings.......what are your thoughts
Don Jacob:
personally i think they should have the same rights as anyone else BBUUUUUUT i don't think they should try to rearange the meaning of marriage. this is a slap in the face and is Sac-re-lig against all moral religions.
Woodrow:
To tell you the truth, I don't give a damn what they do. Do I agree with it? Hell no. Should I impose my views on them? No. Should they impose their views on me? Nope.
Also, I think that it's lame that the those wack ass 9th circuit judges are doing all this bullshit. IMO they are hurting the cause rather than helping.
Just my 2 cents...
I think it'd make Jamal and Max much happier people...
Now_Im_Not_Banned:
Next we'll be marrying farm animals... ::)
justice:
well i dont really give a shit if they choose to get married, its up to, them if they aint doin shit to me i dont care what they do, but yeah i can see where ya'll comin from
Trauma-san:
--- Quote from: Don Jacob Corleone on February 24, 2004, 11:32:56 PM ---personally i think they should have the same rights as anyone else BBUUUUUUT i don't think they should try to rearange the meaning of marriage. this is a slap in the face and is Sac-re-lig against all moral religions.
--- End quote ---
I fully agree, that is the only logical, sane answer. A marriage, by definition, is between a man and a woman. I can't go have a kid. Isn't that unfair? I can't go to a geinicologist... (Hell, I can't even spell geinicologist)... isn't that unfair? I can't go use the women's restroom, isn't that unfair? Hell, My rights are being violated!!! I'm being discriminated against!!!
Those would be the rantings of a liberal faggot. They claim they're being discriminated against, but that's so much bullshit. They have the same rights that I do... the right to marry a WOMAN. They can't 'marry' another man, because the defintion of marriage has nothing to do with that!
It's like they're big babies that can't get their way. I think they should be able to enter into some kind of contract or whatever so all the legal things are the same, but even that is probably too much. Like I said, I have the right to marry a woman, and so do they. They want to be fucking fruitcakes and change the equation to make marriage mean people can marry their sister, I guess, right? I mean, if I can't marry my sister, I'm being discriminated against. R. Kelly wants to marry a 12 year old girl. he's being discriminated against. Polygamists want to marry 3 people at the same time, they're being discriminated against. Yes, I did just group faggots in the same category as child abusers and polygamists.
Marriage is about 2 things. It's not about love. If you're in love, you can live together forever without being married, that's between you and your wife. Marriage is about 1. religion, because it's a religious exercise that almost every religion promotes. No religion promotes homosexuality, which is why homos don't get married! Simple as that. 2. Marriage is about being able to have children, in the eyes of God, righteously. It's all about religion, folks! Religion says faggots are an abomination! How, and why, do they want to get married?
What it comes down to is, marriage, in the hands of normal heterosexuals, has been reduced to nothing. People get married and throw it away at the drop of a hat. Britney Spears is married saturday and divorced monday. Why? Because people have forgotten the religious aspects of marriage! So now the next logical step is to let anybody get married.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version