Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Palestinians: Hamas founder killed in airstrike
Now_Im_Not_Banned:
Why would you condemn the killing of a terrorist organization leader?
smerlus:
--- Quote from: Now_I_Know on March 22, 2004, 09:02:13 PM ---Why would you condemn the killing of a terrorist organization leader?
--- End quote ---
JTSimon:
--- Quote from: Now_I_Know on March 22, 2004, 09:02:13 PM ---Why would you condemn the killing of a terrorist organization leader?
--- End quote ---
Ariel Sharon is terrorist #1.
Trauma-san:
It's because the world has gotten so fuckin' comfy, they've forgotten what got them there. In the fucking dark ages, you wouldn't have protests and shit like this. America was built on bloodshed and wars. That's how it works. they bitch about palestine was taken from them, but Israel was there in the first place, the palestinians took the shit via war. In the 40's, the land was taken from the palestines and given to the israelis. That's how it works. If you have a problem with it, go to war. Kill thousands of people, and perhaps you'll get control of the land.
It's to the point, that a fucking TERRORIST ASSHOLE gets killed, and people mourn for him. Why? because authority is always questioned. Everybody thinks they can do it better, and everybody thinks that the prevaling notion or the ruling power must be wrong. They think that it makes them intelligent to not accept truths and givens. The Israelis appear to be in the right by killing a terrorist. People like Tech and Inf and all these other clowns, though, think that it makes them more intelligent to not accept that given. Things can't be what they seem, to them. They have to concoct huge conspiracy theories that eventually swell so much that they encompass every aspect of their lives. In their altered minds, Israel couldn't have been correct in killing a terrorist. Actually, he probably wasn't even a terrorist to them. Why? Because everybody THINKS he's a terrorist. Therefore the intelligent thing, to them, is to assume that of course he's not. He's actually just misunderstood. He fought back 'the only way he knew how'.
Break it down: their minds can't even decipher right from wrong, black from white, terrorism from war, innocence from guilt. They have absolutely no comprehension of any truth, they only have their slanted view of everything as they see it: The opposite of the prevaliing belief. They feel this is best, so that's what they go with. It's almost like a sickness. I guess when you break it down, it's ignorance. Not just ignorance of knowledge, but just ignorance of ability, the ability to see clearly.
The man was a terrorist. He's responsible, directly, for the deaths of countless numbers of whoever the fuck he could get killed, all for the sin of being born a different race. He sends people strapped with bombs into buses with children, and women on them. They don't care, they don't see clearly.
And now we've got people praising him, and defending this coward fucking crippled pig. I hope it pisses them off to know that the missle basically hit his ass square on, there wasn't even a full body left to bury of the cocksucker. He got what has been coming his way for a long time, and what he gladly imparted with glee on thousands of innocents born a different race, and embracing a different religion.
All this falls on deaf ears; I don't even know why I waste my breath. I'll just get called a bigot, or ignorant, or whatever other words they can think of to describe my clear head.
Jome:
--- Quote from: Now_I_Know on March 22, 2004, 09:02:13 PM ---Why would you condemn the killing of a terrorist organization leader?
--- End quote ---
Beats me..
I think most people are worried about the aftermath.
They can kill Arafat now too, it won't make any difference, hell is still loose.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version