Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Kareem Rush = Future superstar.
acbaylove:
--- Quote from: Now_Im_Blowed on November 17, 2005, 10:29:40 AM ---
--- Quote from: Antonio on November 16, 2005, 11:28:57 PM ---And we traded him for a 2nd rounder. 8)
GYeah!! Go Mitch!!
--- End quote ---
We did it for his good...He wouldn't develop EVER playing behind Kobe. Mitch did it out of good-will for Rush, you think he gave a fuck about that pick?
--- End quote ---
Mitch's job last time i checked it is Los Angeles Lakers GM, not Kareem Rush's personal agent. That trade was pretty stupid, and if the kid will develope into a good player, this trade will be remembered how one of the most moronic in Mitch's career. Matter of fact it's already in the top-5, if you ask me..
Now_Im_Not_Banned:
--- Quote from: Antonio on November 17, 2005, 10:41:54 AM ---
--- Quote from: Now_Im_Blowed on November 17, 2005, 10:29:40 AM ---
--- Quote from: Antonio on November 16, 2005, 11:28:57 PM ---And we traded him for a 2nd rounder. 8)
GYeah!! Go Mitch!!
--- End quote ---
We did it for his good...He wouldn't develop EVER playing behind Kobe. Mitch did it out of good-will for Rush, you think he gave a fuck about that pick?
--- End quote ---
Mitch's job last time i checked it is Los Angeles Lakers GM, not Kareem Rush's personal agent. That trade was pretty stupid, and if the kid will develope into a good player, this trade will be remembered how one of the most moronic in Mitch's career. Matter of fact it's already in the top-5, if you ask me..
--- End quote ---
LMAO...You're a hater. You think I like the trade? HELL NO, you fuck. Kareem Rush was my second player on the Lakers behind Kobe. Mitch Kupchak is not looking out only for his own interests, he's known to look out for his players as well. Rush would serve no purpose to the Lakers behind Kobe, it'd stunt his growth tremendously, which already happened his first 2 season with LA...When Mitch traded Rush, he said that Rush was a tremendous talent that would become something, but unfortunately, he wouldn't be able to grow on the Lakers...Keeping a player like Rush on your team when you're only gunna play him 5-15 minutes is extremely selfish and unfair. Rush was unhappy, Mitch was thoughtful and helped him out...He already has developed into a good player, but if he develops into a superstar, it'll only be because he was traded to a team where he was able to grow and showcase his talent...Get it?
Now_Im_Not_Banned:
--- Quote from: africas seed on November 17, 2005, 10:39:11 AM ---i doubt rush will ever be a franchise player or superstar.
i do think he can be a very solid player though but IMO any team that builds a franchise around a kareem rush is in for some trouble
--- End quote ---
I was envisioning something like an Okafor/Rush/Felton/May era for the Bobcats, with Rush being the main scorer and star.
acbaylove:
--- Quote from: Now_Im_Blowed on November 17, 2005, 11:13:15 AM ---
--- Quote from: Antonio on November 17, 2005, 10:41:54 AM ---
--- Quote from: Now_Im_Blowed on November 17, 2005, 10:29:40 AM ---
--- Quote from: Antonio on November 16, 2005, 11:28:57 PM ---And we traded him for a 2nd rounder. 8)
GYeah!! Go Mitch!!
--- End quote ---
We did it for his good...He wouldn't develop EVER playing behind Kobe. Mitch did it out of good-will for Rush, you think he gave a fuck about that pick?
--- End quote ---
Mitch's job last time i checked it is Los Angeles Lakers GM, not Kareem Rush's personal agent. That trade was pretty stupid, and if the kid will develope into a good player, this trade will be remembered how one of the most moronic in Mitch's career. Matter of fact it's already in the top-5, if you ask me..
--- End quote ---
LMAO...You're a hater. You think I like the trade? HELL NO, you fuck. Kareem Rush was my second player on the Lakers behind Kobe. Mitch Kupchak is not looking out only for his own interests, he's known to look out for his players as well. Rush would serve no purpose to the Lakers behind Kobe, it'd stunt his growth tremendously, which already happened his first 2 season with LA...When Mitch traded Rush, he said that Rush was a tremendous talent that would become something, but unfortunately, he wouldn't be able to grow on the Lakers...Keeping a player like Rush on your team when you're only gunna play him 5-15 minutes is extremely selfish and unfair. Rush was unhappy, Mitch was thoughtful and helped him out...He already has developed into a good player, but if he develops into a superstar, it'll only be because he was traded to a team where he was able to grow and showcase his talent...Get it?
--- End quote ---
This is one of the most moronic post i've ever read. So your theory is that if you have a young promising player like him you should send him for free to another team who can keep the faith in him and give him a good minutage just cause you care about him? Sounds like old school Clippers, to me. If you got a good player, you should lock him, and it's Phil's job to find him a good role/minutage. Following your theory we should trade Bynum to Charlotte for a second rounder to let him play 20 minutes per game. Or Wafer to Atlanta. Or Walton to Golden State. Are you fucking crazy? Mitch made a fucking mistake. Just admit it and stop making nonsense with your bullshit theories.
Now_Im_Not_Banned:
--- Quote from: Antonio on November 17, 2005, 11:54:28 AM ---
--- Quote from: Now_Im_Blowed on November 17, 2005, 11:13:15 AM ---
--- Quote from: Antonio on November 17, 2005, 10:41:54 AM ---
--- Quote from: Now_Im_Blowed on November 17, 2005, 10:29:40 AM ---
--- Quote from: Antonio on November 16, 2005, 11:28:57 PM ---And we traded him for a 2nd rounder. 8)
GYeah!! Go Mitch!!
--- End quote ---
We did it for his good...He wouldn't develop EVER playing behind Kobe. Mitch did it out of good-will for Rush, you think he gave a fuck about that pick?
--- End quote ---
Mitch's job last time i checked it is Los Angeles Lakers GM, not Kareem Rush's personal agent. That trade was pretty stupid, and if the kid will develope into a good player, this trade will be remembered how one of the most moronic in Mitch's career. Matter of fact it's already in the top-5, if you ask me..
--- End quote ---
LMAO...You're a hater. You think I like the trade? HELL NO, you fuck. Kareem Rush was my second player on the Lakers behind Kobe. Mitch Kupchak is not looking out only for his own interests, he's known to look out for his players as well. Rush would serve no purpose to the Lakers behind Kobe, it'd stunt his growth tremendously, which already happened his first 2 season with LA...When Mitch traded Rush, he said that Rush was a tremendous talent that would become something, but unfortunately, he wouldn't be able to grow on the Lakers...Keeping a player like Rush on your team when you're only gunna play him 5-15 minutes is extremely selfish and unfair. Rush was unhappy, Mitch was thoughtful and helped him out...He already has developed into a good player, but if he develops into a superstar, it'll only be because he was traded to a team where he was able to grow and showcase his talent...Get it?
--- End quote ---
This is one of the most moronic post i've ever read. So your theory is that if you have a young promising player like him you should send him for free to another team who can keep the faith in him and give him a good minutage just cause you care about him? Sounds like old school Clippers, to me. If you got a good player, you should lock him, and it's Phil's job to find him a good role/minutage. Following your theory we should trade Bynum to Charlotte for a second rounder to let him play 20 minutes per game. Or Wafer to Atlanta. Or Walton to Golden State. Are you fucking crazy? Mitch made a fucking mistake. Just admit it and stop making nonsense with your bullshit theories.
--- End quote ---
My bullshit theories? It's not a theory, Mitch said that himself when the trade was made. The Laker organization even commented about wanting Rush to get playing time and develop elsewhere. You are the one making moronic posts...Rush can't play on the court with Kobe. They almost play the EXACT same game. Rush isn't gunna get ANY minutes behind Kobe, EVER. In fact, if Rush was still with us, he'd be averaging the same stats as he was 2 years ago...The Lakers didn't want an unhappy player with a great amount of talent sitting on the bench 90% of the time. In return, we got Ronny Turiaf and Von Wafer, which is better than just cutting him (though I still HATE the trade, for my own selfish reasons)...Now, I have no idea why you brought Bynum into this, he's supposed to be our big-man of the future, not of now...LOL. Your analogies are dumber than your thoughts... :-\
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version