Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Worst President of the 20th century
GoodLuvn169:
--- Quote from: FuNk-U-uP on April 07, 2004, 06:22:49 PM ---
--- Quote from: GoodLuvn169 on April 07, 2004, 06:20:40 PM ---I forgot to put Taft. That was a fat fuck with no idea about what he was doin.
--- End quote ---
LMAO.
You should've made it of all-time. That way we could have Bush on there, the actual worst president.
--- End quote ---
I personally think that Bush isnt doing that bad
GoodLuvn169:
--- Quote from: I Just Wasn't Made For These Times on April 07, 2004, 06:24:11 PM ---You should have listed Bush. All of these pinheads don't know any presidents besides Clinton and Bush, and Clinton walks on water to them.
--- End quote ---
lol, your right :)
FuNk-U-uP:
How long has it been since a president has had an overall net-loss in jobs? Yea, yea, last month 300,000 new jobs were created, but what does it bring the overall to? -1.8 million jobs?
Clinton wasn't as great as people make him out to be. Yes, the economy was great. When it comes to foreign policy, he was just like the many U.S. presidents who had come before him.
Trauma-san:
It's amazing to me that people credit Clinton with the economy, when he clearly had nothing to do with the tecnological innovation sparked by the internet which drove the economy farther than it ever should have gone in the 90's, and then eventually crashed back down to ruins as Bush was entering office.
so, in their feeble minds (and guys, that's the only way to describe the mind of a child who refuses to learn)... Clinton was responsible for TECNOLOGICAL advances; and even though the downturn clearly started before he left office, BUSH was responsible for stock prices being entirely too high in Clinton's term. When the Stock settled back to more reasonable amounts, and people lost lots of money, hindering the economy, it's also Bush's fault.... When planes fly into our banks and skyscrapers, hindering the economy; that's not the terrorists fault (who claim actively that they hate americans for where they are born, regardless of policy)... it's Bush's fault.
Furthermore, when the economy is resurged, not through any kind of outside developments like tecnology breakthroughs, but through a conservative fiscal plan which includes tax breaks instituted by Bush; it's not enough, and it's not even considered his end result, even though it's of course considered his responsibility.
What kind of fuck up thinks like that? The politically desperate.
Face it. The Economy is good. People are getting jobs. Nothing to see here. Move along.
FuNk-U-uP:
I'm not giving Clinton credit for the economy during his time, I just said that people were more satisfied with the way the economy stood. It wasn't him that created the internet bubble of stocks and whatnot. Point is, right now during Bush's term, we're at a netloss of about 2 million jobs. A lot of this has to do with outsourcing. Our government shouldn't companies do this to our economy. But then again, this is a capitalistic society, and that's how things work. I just think there should be more control when it comes to things like that. You also see companies avoiding tax payments by setting up a little place on some island with just an office and claiming that's where the company is from.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version