Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Death Penalty debate
DAYUM:
it depends how they kill them not all people deserve painful deaths only rapeists and serial killers that did sum reall fucked up shit
Don Seer:
^ what the hell you talkin about?
no one is given 'cruel' deaths in the US system... it aint like they're tortured n shit
smerlus:
for the people that say that a person shouldn't die for their actions...i have a quick scenario....what if the murderer had hostages, killed a few and threatened to kill more....should a sniper not take his life? right there you have judge, jury and executioner all rolled into one
and to the people that say the death penalty is cruel... years of ass rapings, beatings and slowly dying of AIDS is an ok life?
Don Seer:
i thought this might come up, i already kinda touched on it but didn't take further.
yes its right, because its preventing further deaths.
now i suppose you'll say the same argument could be said for killers, that if they're killed it stops them killing again. but so does locking them up.
the saying "prevention is better than cure" comes to mind..
the cure is using the sniper, prevention is having got him beforehand...
smerlus:
but murders still happen in prison...look at Jefferey Dahmer...shouldn't these murders be prevented too?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version