Lifestyle > Train of Thought

Death Penalty debate

<< < (2/12) > >>

Sikotic™:
ONLY AND ONLY IF there is without a shadow of a doubt, proof that the suspect committed the heinous crime. There should be no question at all when your thinking about ending someones life.

This goes for people who have been on death row for 20-30 years as well. Their cases should be re-evaluated and if there is more than enough evidence that they committed the crime then fine, kill them.

7even:
As far as Im concerned the USA is the only country of the so-called civilized ones where killing ppl is legal. (hint: death penalty)

Don Seer:
^ exactly what i said.

when is killing someone, no matter under what circumstances civilised?

lock em, throw away the key, and make em repent + suffer.

dont give them a quick death and no more.. its done "humanely" right? so they don't suffer.. whats the point? apart from saving money.

Lincoln:

--- Quote from: Overseer on June 21, 2004, 11:57:18 AM ---^ exactly what i said.

when is killing someone, no matter under what circumstances civilised?

lock em, throw away the key, and make em repent + suffer.

dont give them a quick death and no more.. its done "humanely" right? so they don't suffer.. whats the point? apart from saving money.

--- End quote ---

It's not just the money, it's the principle behind it. Why should a good law-abiding person pay for a criminal?

Don Seer:
^ isn't that selfish on your part?

killing someone takes you to their level.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page