Lifestyle > Train of Thought
U.S. military spendings VS. U.S. foreign aid
Montana00:
Well while it is nice help to have other countries with us in iraq, america doesnt need the help.
Wait....Philipines just pulled out their 54 troops from iraq. I dont know what were going to do anymore without their help. ::)
Thirteen:
--- Quote from: Don Rizzle on July 22, 2004, 06:05:30 AM ---america needs other foreign troops
1 because most iraqi's hate americans
2 becease they are heavy handed, the softer british approach has lead to a relatively more peaceful southern region
3 to make it look less like an american conquest
4 america isn't any good at maintaining peace or law and order when europeans have alot more experience in this area as we usually clear up after the americans. and british troops in particular have learnt lots of lessons from northen ireland which applied to iraq
--- End quote ---
that's what i said....but the "teacher" says in one post that bush needed other troops to control the situation then went on to say that no one can control the situation even if they tried... he thinks that he's smarter than the president and all the advisors around him....he's such a dilusional little girl
Maradona:
--- Quote from: Thirteen on July 22, 2004, 01:24:03 AM ---you haven't sonned me yet puppet
a. can you prove that your reason is the only reason bush asked for help?
no
b. all hell hasn't broken lose, 15,000 to 900 is great considering we wiped out one army and now our battling guerilla fighters...
so where have you proven me wrong in this thread?
--- End quote ---
A. I guess Bush just wanted some Germans to grill his soldiers some Bratwurst, the French to bring some wine, some Italians for some spaghetti, etc. Why the fuck do you think Bush asked for HELP? LOL, IF YOU CAN'T FIGURE THIS OUT THEN I SUGGEST YOU SEE A PSYCHOLOGIST BECAUSE I CAN ONLY HELP YOU UNDERSTAND BETTER TO A CERTAIN EXTENT.
B. What army? Did they even put up a fight? U.S. soldiers admitted the "Iraqi army" didn't do shit. If you really believe that we're winning because we killed more people, then you need to use some fuckin logic. You think we're the winners because we killed thousands of civilians? The number of U.S. soldiers who have died is a lot greater than expected. I think 900 lives lost in Iraq for an unjust war is 900 too many. You might see these dead people as "worth it", but I don't. I value the human life too much to say something like that.
Thirteen:
here's your answer to A again...
--- Quote from: Don Rizzle on July 22, 2004, 06:05:30 AM ---america needs other foreign troops
1 because most iraqi's hate americans
2 becease they are heavy handed, the softer british approach has lead to a relatively more peaceful southern region
3 to make it look less like an american conquest
4 america isn't any good at maintaining peace or law and order when europeans have alot more experience in this area as we usually clear up after the americans. and british troops in particular have learnt lots of lessons from northen ireland which applied to iraq
--- End quote ---
and as for B. they did have an army, it's not our fault that they got wiped out so quick...and as i said 900 deaths isn't bad at all
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version