Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Bill O'Reilly targets another rapper
ecrazy:
LISTEN TO ORIELY RIP ON JADA
http://www.soundclick.com/util/streamM3U.m3u?ID=1432810&q=Lo
Smoke:
Freedom of speech. What that means? Freedom of speech. It means you can write/say George Bush is a bad President. You can write/say you dont like him and his dog. You can write/say you disagree with him on something because.. That's freedom of speech. To say Bush is a retarded got nothing to do with the freedom of speech. It's a diss. And you cant say that, expecially on a public television, or in a song, or in a book, etc directed to the mass. To say that Bush killed 3,000 innocent got nothing to do with the freedom of speech. To say that Bush is a terrorist got nothing to do with the freedom of speech. You can say you like ketchup and dislike mustard, tho'. Get it str8. P.S. I dont know how it is there in the USA, but it Italy only in the Parliament it's possible to have a 100% true freedom of speech, and you cant be sued if you say something.
Smoke:
--- Quote from: 7even the Harbinger on July 27, 2004, 03:01:17 PM ---How anyone can be in favor of bombing a country that hasnt done shit and killing ppl that havent done shit is beyond me
--- End quote ---
That's legit. You can say/think that, and vote for the other dude. That's freedom of speech and democracy.
M Dogg™:
--- Quote from: Antonio on July 30, 2004, 10:56:55 AM ---P.S. I dont know how it is there in the USA, but it Italy only in the Parliament it's possible to have a 100% true freedom of speech, and you cant be sued if you say something.
--- End quote ---
Our freedom of speech basically goes like this. We can say whatever we want, unless we are like in a theater, and yell fire causing everyone to panic, or if we are members of the press and we slander a persons name. Now, according to our freedom of speech, who is closer to breaking the U.S. idea of freedom of speech. The only way though slander is inforce is if you sue for someone slandering your name. Now Jada asking why Bush knocked down the towers, that's legit because first it's a question, and second we have the right to talk about our elected officals. After Moore's film, it became alright to ask this question, since it is ok to question our elected officals. O'Reily I guess would not have that, but if shoe was on the other foot, you're damn right he would have Clinton questioned for knocking down the towers.
Don Jacob:
--- Quote from: M Dogg on July 30, 2004, 11:19:59 AM ---
--- Quote from: Antonio on July 30, 2004, 10:56:55 AM ---P.S. I dont know how it is there in the USA, but it Italy only in the Parliament it's possible to have a 100% true freedom of speech, and you cant be sued if you say something.
--- End quote ---
Our freedom of speech basically goes like this. We can say whatever we want, unless we are like in a theater, and yell fire causing everyone to panic, or if we are members of the press and we slander a persons name. Now, according to our freedom of speech, who is closer to breaking the U.S. idea of freedom of speech. The only way though slander is inforce is if you sue for someone slandering your name. Now Jada asking why Bush knocked down the towers, that's legit because first it's a question, and second we have the right to talk about our elected officals. After Moore's film, it became alright to ask this question, since it is ok to question our elected officals. O'Reily I guess would not have that, but if shoe was on the other foot, you're damn right he would have Clinton questioned for knocking down the towers.
--- End quote ---
Mdogg what the fuck are you even trying to say in the second half of your whole shpill?
you're right in the first half . .....in the US you can say anything you want as long as it doesn't fuck with anyone's rights. you can't cuss on the radio or basic cable because it can hurt children. you can't make false acsations ...well you can actually cuz i see it all the time on tv, but you're not suppose to because it hurts pussy's egos and defames someone's true image.
BUT, what viacom (mtv) did was their right!....if jadakiss didn't want his shit edited then why turn his video into MTV? if MTV (who owns that copy of the video now that you summited) doesn't like something that they now own then they have the right to edit it.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version