Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Michael Moore is Going To Be on Bill O'Reilly's Show Tommorow (Tuesday)!!!!!
eS El Duque:
--- Quote from: CWalker187 on July 27, 2004, 02:58:17 PM ---
--- Quote from: 7even the Harbinger on July 27, 2004, 02:17:31 PM ---can anybody record it with a digi cam and put it online? I dont have Fox lol
--- End quote ---
I am not suprised. Fox News is the biggest cable news channel here in the US...theyir ratings dwarf those of CNN and MSNBC combined. But alot of left wing socialist countries like Canada and probably your country won't let Fox News air there because they don't want people exposed to new, different viewpoints besides the leftist brainwashing you guys usually get.
--- End quote ---
we get fox >:(...but no fox news (i think on sundays we do)...instead we get the local news from that state we're closest too...Q-13 fox is mine
satillite gets you it
BuddenzNasir:
Mach u bieng a 14 yr old with politics is kinda impressive i guess, no not really cuz any street smart person would kno his politics at an early age but, your arguments are jus ridiculous, u sound like ur Bill O'rielly trying to win an argument or something. just give it up open your eyes, learn a few things. no one became safer with Sudaam gone if thats true, we still would'nt be losing an average of 3 american soldiers everyday. its all coming back to haunt USA and CIA for putting him in power anyways.
Machiavelli:
--- Quote ---no one became safer with Sudaam gone if thats true, we still would'nt be losing an average of 3 american soldiers everyday. its all coming back to haunt USA and CIA for putting him in power anyways.
--- End quote ---
Last time i checked 1 soldier a day is killed in Iraq. Last time I checked the USA and CIA never put Saddam in power in the first place.
--- Quote from: Maradona on July 27, 2004, 11:33:29 PM ---So we switched
our "main" reason for going there. So why didn't we hold any grudges before he nationalized the oil fields? In case you're wondering, he's always been a ruthless leader, so please answer that Sherlock (Yes, I'm being sarcastic, since you're probably too dumb to figure even that out)
--- End quote ---
Could you re-phrase that question please?
Sikotic™:
--- Quote from: SMiLE on July 27, 2004, 07:37:53 PM ---This whole interview as well as this thread is useless. Nobody's learning anything or changing minds. Moore believes one way, people support him, and O'Reilly believes another way, and people support him. There's no use in arguing about it, nobody's looking to learn, all they're looking to do is defend their position. Fuck that, it's a waste of time.
--- End quote ---
In this situation, definitely
Maradona:
--- Quote from: Machiavelli on July 28, 2004, 03:25:19 PM ---
--- Quote ---no one became safer with Sudaam gone if thats true, we still would'nt be losing an average of 3 american soldiers everyday. its all coming back to haunt USA and CIA for putting him in power anyways.
--- End quote ---
Last time i checked 1 soldier a day is killed in Iraq. Last time I checked the USA and CIA never put Saddam in power in the first place.
--- Quote from: Maradona on July 27, 2004, 11:33:29 PM ---So we switched
our "main" reason for going there. So why didn't we hold any grudges before he nationalized the oil fields? In case you're wondering, he's always been a ruthless leader, so please answer that Sherlock (Yes, I'm being sarcastic, since you're probably too dumb to figure even that out)
--- End quote ---
Could you re-phrase that question please?
--- End quote ---
First of all, when was the last time you checked who put Saddam in power? Do you not know that the CIA helped Saddam gain the power to become leader of Iraq, the U.S. WANTED Saddam to become leader of Iraq because the previous leader chose to nationalize the oil fields, which angered the U.S.
And NO, I can't rephrase that question. If what I say goes way over your head, just say so.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version