It's May 11, 2024, 08:09:11 AM
QuoteI know i can count but can you....1-2. Afghanistan last time i checked was 1 country. Explain iraq to me....on second though ive read your other posts, please dont.Iraq was harboring a evil dictator that killed hundreds of thousands of people in the Middle East. They were also harboring terrorists.
I know i can count but can you....1-2. Afghanistan last time i checked was 1 country. Explain iraq to me....on second though ive read your other posts, please dont.
He sent us into war because the Russian Intelligence, Britain Intelligence, and CIA all said that Iraq had Wm's. If you were president you would just ignore the warraning that Intelligence was giving you?
USA is harboring an evil president that killed hundreds of thousands of people in the Middle East. They are also harboring ppl who support genocide.you see a similiarity?
Quote from: davida.b. on August 01, 2004, 12:52:38 AMAmen. I fucking hate Bush and all his supporters. Everytime I see someone drive up with a Bush bumper sticker (it's always some middle aged female bitch), I feel like throwing up. In conclusion: if you support Bush, than you're a fucking retard. And whys that?
Amen. I fucking hate Bush and all his supporters. Everytime I see someone drive up with a Bush bumper sticker (it's always some middle aged female bitch), I feel like throwing up. In conclusion: if you support Bush, than you're a fucking retard.
Quote from: 7even the Harbinger on August 01, 2004, 06:22:24 PMUSA is harboring an evil president that killed hundreds of thousands of people in the Middle East. They are also harboring ppl who support genocide.you see a similiarity?NO, i dont see the similarity beacause first off, Bush didnt kill HUNDEREDS of Thousands of inocent people in the Middleast. Second, Bush didnt kill these people on PURPOSE he killed them by accident. On the other hand, Saddam orderd the killing of hunderds of thousands of people in the middle East.Third, thats bullshit that the US is harbroring people who suport genide. Show me proof
2. by accident? oh yea, the bombs on baghdad were dropped by accident for sure. something must have went wrong there. all these soldiers gunning down civilians and even children must have pulled the trigger by accident too. and Bush did not order troops to get into Iraq and shit I suppose. They went there on their on. Alright.
3. proof? you do exist, your postings confirm that. so, yes. + other dudes on the board, e.g. gangstauu, cwalker, and more. + other dudes in your country that dont post here.
Quote from: 7even the Harbinger on August 01, 2004, 06:22:24 PMUSA is harboring an evil president that killed hundreds of thousands of people in the Middle East. They are also harboring ppl who support genocide.you see a similiarity?NO, i don't see the similarity because....First off, Bush didn't kill HUNDEREDS of Thousands of Innocent people in the Mideast. Second, Bush didn't kill these people on PURPOSE he killed them by accident. On the other hand, Saddam ORDERED the killing of hundreds of thousands of people in the middle East.Third, thats bullshit that the US is harboring people who support genocide. Show me proof!
Do you really think that all bush does it say "were going to war" and then lets the generals do the rest?
Our military doesnt make mistakes, our military just doesnt care. Were you alive when the shock and awe campaign was going on? We bombed the hell out of bahgdad. And honestly think, how much did we actually accomplish by doing that?
That is like someone invading our country and saying were going to help you. They then proceed to bomb new york city and say "We suspected that donald rumsfeld was in a building in NY city, We dont know which one, so we bombed everything.
Dont be so nieve to believe that these 15,000 - 20,000 civillian casualties were accidental. When you bomb a residential area, your bound to kill some civillians.
and btw,First off, Bush didn't kill HUNDEREDS of Thousands of Innocent people in the Mideast. Second, Bush didn't kill these people on PURPOSE he killed them by accident.First he did and then he didn't?
Quoteand Bush did not order troops to get into Iraq and shit I suppose. They went there on their on. Alright. Also if Bush didnt order troops to get into Iraq then why are you blaming bush
and Bush did not order troops to get into Iraq and shit I suppose. They went there on their on. Alright.
Annnnnd your point is?
Proof?
Even if that was true, which it isn't, would you tell me what was so great about Bush's record as Governor of Texas
How is raising taxes on the top 2% going to hurt the bottom end?
Oh yeah? How do you know. And he's going to build alliances and not be unilateral, the unilateralism of Bush has lead to America having to take troops away from Afghanistan and the Korean border to help in Iraq.
He actually said that he wants to look for alternative sources of energy. But hey, when did the Republicans ever let the truth get in the way of a good negative ad?
Higher taxes for the richest. And can you explain why lowering the cost of drugs results in these things?
Who really gives a fuck about the environment? I'm not going to even address that one.
Yeah. On the top 2 percent. Those earning over £200,000 a year.
Do you know the shit Bush has done? He killed millions of soldiers just so..
Mach ducking and diving away from this thread