DUBCC - Tha Connection > Outbound Connection

r. kelly vs. michael jackson cases

(1/3) > >>

NobodyButMe:
does anyone else know wtf is going on here?

you got r. kelly, who ON VIDEO is pissing on the face of an underage girl, and charges are dropped.

and you have michael jackon, (who may be a little wierd), going to trial for very similar accounts but with no substantial evidence.

Gangstauu:
I didnt saw that video, he pissed in her face, nasty shit
I did saw the girl of the video who do looks like 16 to me
I know micheal had sex wit way younger children
But I dunno bout the cases

B-Blaze:
^ English Please!!!
and how do u know michael had sex wit younger children? were u there? Innocent until proven guilty

Sikotic™:
Whether they did it or not, they both have paper, therefore, they'll get off easy.

Trauma-san:
I really don't see how R.Kelly is going to get off with no time, they literally have several tapes of him, plus, the girl in question is testifying against him.  His defense so far is "that ain't me!!!" when they show him pictures of obviously, him, on tape with this girl.  He's claiming somebody spent millions of dollars to digitally edit his face onto every frame of the person in the video.  Come on now.  Guilty.







Michael on the other hand has nothing but public opinion against him.  There's no evidence at all suggesting he did anything with the kid, and the dates the kid claims something happened, Michael was by all accounts not even in the same state as the kid.  So there's not really much of a case there.  Michael's lawyers, also, have signed statements, and even videotaped interviews with the kid, and his mother, stating that Michael had never done anything innappropriate.  Add onto this that out of the literally hundreds of kids that visit Michael's house each month, none have said anything besides this boy, and you get the picture of a blackmail attempt against one of the world's richest entertainers. 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page