Lifestyle > Train of Thought

U.S. Report Finds No Evidence of Iraq WMD

<< < (2/6) > >>

Leggy Hendrix:
lmao @ sik's avi...your dog is even more gangsta now!!

anyway, i saw this shit on the news yesterday, but to be honest i thought this was almost common knowledge already...

Machiavelli:
OK, we all knew that Iraq didn't have any WMDs besides Saddam himself, but Iraq clearly had the intentions of making and pursuing a weapons plan and they have used WMDs several times in the past so basically what Bush and Republicans are saying is that we would rather be safe then sorry with WMD situation in Iraq.

Rampant:
Its better to be safe then sorry?

Well in that case America should just invade every single country, because they all have the possibility of becoming evil.

Sikotic™:

--- Quote from: Machiavelli on October 07, 2004, 03:31:28 PM ---OK, we all knew that Iraq didn't have any WMDs besides Saddam himself, but Iraq clearly had the intentions of making and pursuing a weapons plan and they have used WMDs several times in the past so basically what Bush and Republicans are saying is that we would rather be safe then sorry with WMD situation in Iraq.

--- End quote ---

I can't believe you said that as if it were a good thing we invaded a sovereign state under false pretenses. WE WERE LIED TO and you act like it's no big deal.

King Tech Quadafi:
Since Bush is a proven liar, the next step dear Yankees is to question what happened to the Democratic party post 9/11, why did they bitch up? Co signing Patriot Act, and the Iraq war with the same bloodthirst as Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page