Lifestyle > Train of Thought

New Bin Laden video released..

<< < (4/7) > >>

acbaylove:

--- Quote from: Ant on October 29, 2004, 05:52:24 PM ---
--- Quote from: Woodrow on October 29, 2004, 04:24:15 PM ---It's funny how this turned into a "Bush" thread instead of a Bin Laden thread.


--- End quote ---

Actually the original poster was curious whether we felt this video would help Kerry or Bush.  Below you can find one of the many reasons it will help Kerry.

http://homepage.mac.com/njenson/movies/notconcerned.html

--- End quote ---

I bet Bush will win now.

acbaylove:

--- Quote from: Ant on October 29, 2004, 03:28:27 PM ---If Bush "captured or killed" Usama Bin Laden as he promised the American people he would this tape never would have aired.
--- End quote ---

Is your sentence a joke i missed? Damn man, you are paranoid with Bush! If Clinton "captured or killed" Saddam Hussein as he promised the American people he would this war never would have fought. Ok? Lol.

Ant:
Englewood.  Are you really serious?  Your citing a random Op/Ed piece as your rational for why Bush needs to be re-elected?  As it stands today over 35 newspapers that endorsed Bush in 2000, "flip flopped" and decided to instead endorse Kerry.  Kerry has recieved about 40% more newspaper endorsements than Bush.   

The most impressive to date is the recent endorsement from The Economist.  The well-regarded Economist typically leans slightly republican and enjoys a large republican readership.

Additionally, editors from the American Conservative have also endorsed Kerry. 

If you want to post random quotes about Bush being good, and Kerry being bad I suggest you look for credible sources.  I've already posted plenty of credible sources explaining why Bush is bad for America including well respected academics, newspapers, magazines, and even well-regarded members of the Republican Party.  The reason you can't find any is simple: your side is wrong. 

Ant:

--- Quote from: Antonio on October 29, 2004, 06:58:29 PM ---
--- Quote from: Ant on October 29, 2004, 03:28:27 PM ---If Bush "captured or killed" Usama Bin Laden as he promised the American people he would this tape never would have aired.
--- End quote ---

Is your sentence a joke i missed? Damn man, you are paranoid with Bush! If Clinton "captured or killed" Saddam Hussein as he promised the American people he would this war never would have fought. Ok? Lol.

--- End quote ---

I was quoting Bush, while you were making up a quotation from Clinton.  I don't recall Clinton ever promising he would "capture or kill" Saddam Hussein. 

Woodrow:

--- Quote from: Ant on October 29, 2004, 09:16:06 PM ---Englewood.  Are you really serious?  Your citing a random Op/Ed piece as your rational for why Bush needs to be re-elected?  As it stands today over 35 newspapers that endorsed Bush in 2000, "flip flopped" and decided to instead endorse Kerry.  Kerry has recieved about 40% more newspaper endorsements than Bush.   

The most impressive to date is the recent endorsement from The Economist.  The well-regarded Economist typically leans slightly republican and enjoys a large republican readership.

Additionally, editors from the American Conservative have also endorsed Kerry. 

If you want to post random quotes about Bush being good, and Kerry being bad I suggest you look for credible sources.  I've already posted plenty of credible sources explaining why Bush is bad for America including well respected academics, newspapers, magazines, and even well-regarded members of the Republican Party.  The reason you can't find any is simple: your side is wrong. 

--- End quote ---

LOL @ YOU chastising ME for posting a random op-ed piece. Just because you haven't heard of the author, doesn't make her points any less valid or credible. It's funny that you're talking about ME being close minded, but you dismiss the article I posted simply because you aren't familiar with the author, Why don't you respond to my points about how our sworn enemies (their words) support John Kerry???

Just because more newspapers support Kerry than Bush, does that make him the better candidate? Does the fact that 35 newspapers changed their views 4 years down the road make John Kerry the better candidate?

If you think so...

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version