Lifestyle > Train of Thought

Clinton vs Bush

<< < (2/3) > >>

Ant:
I know your kind of in the middle but you did seem to agree with the main point of doube standards, which I just dont think is the case.  Yeah there are some double standards I'm sure, mainly becuz we live in a partisan world, but the arguments you posted weren't accurate. 

Ras Kass' Toothpick:

--- Quote from: Ant on October 30, 2004, 06:35:26 PM --- Maybe thats why the higher your level of education the less likely you are to vote Bush.
--- End quote ---

 ::)

white Boy:
i dont know a lot.. but bush war cost a fuck load more than 87 billion

Rampant:
Good post.

Of course people who love clinton are going to defend this to the death.

"well in clintons case...."
"but in bush's case he fucked up and......"

It all depends on who you like more. But it is funny how the comparisons are close, but thought of differently.

Trauma-san:
Another of my favorites.

Bush gets the local warlords to help fight in Afganistan, and Kerry slams him for 'outsourcing' the job of hunting for Bin Ladin.

Bush arrests Saddam, invades Iraq, and kills his two sons with our own forces, and Kerry slams him for not getting a coalition.

So a coalition in Afganistan is bad, and a coalition in Iraq is good.  Gotcha, Senator Kerry. 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page