Lifestyle > Train of Thought

Something I Don't Get...

(1/9) > >>

7even:
For a start, Nader get by far fewer votes than he did 4 years ago, so, logically speaking, that should have been good news for Kerry.

Now, tell me, what the fuck is this? Bush even got the POPULAR MAJORITY... that's nuts..

.. have there actually been people, who voted Nader on 2000, and now voted Bush? That's insane.

overall, after such a horrible term by Bush and fewer Nader votes, I dont get how it's possible that Bush gets a considerable bigger lead over Kerry.. when Gore was doing better on the popular vote than Bush in last elections..


Unbelieveable.

*Jamal*:
The title of this thread pretty much explains what I've been trying to tell you about yourself for a long time... finally, you understand that you simply don't understand  :-*

mauzip:
Whining does not help.

7even:
lol Im not whining, it's just some weird as thing. unless someone can rationally explain that you ppl should just shut up fore posting stuff like this... seriously.

*Jamal*:
Nader received fewer votes than he did in the last election

Since the election is based on Electoral Votes, only the % within each state basically counts

Nader might have received fewer votes within each state, but you have to remember that there are newly registered voters... people who didn't vote last election, including those who have turned 18 since...

Also, just like there are "swing-states", there are "swing-voters"... individuals who don't vote for a certain party all the time...

More people voted for Bush... it's that simple... I know you're not very bright, but even you should understand this

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page