Lifestyle > Train of Thought

11 states pass bans on same-sex unions

(1/5) > >>

Lincoln:
In clean sweep, 11 states pass bans on same-sex unionsThe Associated Press
Updated: 10:44 a.m. ET Nov. 3, 2004Gay rights activists received a rebuke from the deep South to North Dakota as voters in 11 states approved constitutional amendments to ban same-sex marriage in a clean sweep for proponents of traditional one-man, one-woman unions.


 "The results just go to show that the citizens ... clearly understand the value of natural marriage," said Christina Rondeau, director of the North Dakota Family Alliance, a group that supported the amendment.

The vote Tuesday in North Dakota was 3-1 in favor — the same margin as in Georgia and Kentucky as the proposal passed in all 11 states where it was on the ballot. The margin was 6-1 in Mississippi, while the amendment was approved by lesser ratios in Arkansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma and Utah.

Initiatives backed by church groups
The issue was put on the ballot in six states through petition drives waged by conservative, church-backed citizens groups. But support of the amendment appeared widespread; in Ohio, it received equal support from men and women, blacks and whites.

 Gay-rights activists quickly raised the possibility of court challenges in Georgia, Ohio and Mississippi, although supporters predicted the new laws would hold up.

"Will there be a challenge? Probably, probably," said Monte Stewart of the pro-amendment "Yes on Three Coalition" in Utah. "Will it succeed? No."

The most disappointing outcome for gay activists was in Oregon, where supporters of same-sex marriage felt they had the best chance of success.

For gay rights groups, the one-sided results, while disheartening, were optimistically seen as just one strike in an ongoing fight.

Votes seen as ‘a blip'
The Tuesday votes will become "a blip in the longer term historic view," said Karl Olson, executive director of the gay-rights group PRIDE in Montana. "Our Constitution isn't going to be able to sustain this kind of restriction on civil rights."

The proposed amendments in Mississippi, Montana and Oregon referred only to marriage, specifying that it should be limited to unions of one man and one woman. The measures in Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Michigan, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma and Utah called for a ban on civil unions as well.

  CLICK FOR RELATED STORY
Voters decide scores of ballot initiatives
 
 


"That certainly is disappointing news that many Kentucky voters would think it's appropriate to write discrimination into our constitution," said Beth Wilson of the American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky.

Earlier this year, voters in Missouri and Louisiana approved gay marriage ban amendments. Louisiana's amendment was later struck down in state court on the grounds that it improperly dealt with more than one subject by banning not only same-sex marriage but also any legal recognition of common-law relationships, domestic partnerships and civil unions.

Gay-rights activists say they intend to press marriage-rights lawsuits in states like California and New Jersey, where they believe the high courts might eventually rule in their favor.

© 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6383353/

mauzip:
and still you jack off to lesbians... hypocrite

Woodrow:
I'm glad that marriage was defined and set in stone, but I REALLY hope this doesn't start to take away peoples rights. It's my hope, that some sort of civil union legislation should come about.

Suga Foot:

--- Quote from: Woodrow on November 03, 2004, 11:15:58 AM ---I'm glad that marriage was defined and set in stone, but I REALLY hope this doesn't start to take away peoples rights. It's my hope, that some sort of civil union legislation should come about.


--- End quote ---

exactly how I feel

Lincoln:

--- Quote from: Viva Le Mauzip!! on November 03, 2004, 11:15:15 AM ---and still you jack off to lesbians... hypocrite

--- End quote ---

I do? Since when? And what does masturbation have to do with marriage?

Personally I have no problem with civil unions but marriage is a religious ceremony, with religious backrounds. It needs to be preserved.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page