Lifestyle > Train of Thought

Government Secrecy Under Bush *Updated*

<< < (2/3) > >>

7even:

--- Quote ---And a third provision expanded
the use of "sneak and peak" search warrants, which allow the Justice Department to
search homes and other premises secretly without giving notice to the occupants.

--- End quote ---

LoL.

M Dogg™:

--- Quote from: Rampant on November 11, 2004, 02:49:42 PM ---
--- Quote from: Ant on November 11, 2004, 01:34:30 PM ---The link to the full report is available here:
http://democrats.reform.house.gov/features/secrecy_report/index.asp

--- End quote ---
no thanks

--- End quote ---

the .gov means it's an offical government document. That means, wither it's democrat or republican, that it's seen as the truth according to the U.S. gov. Stop being close minded.

Rampant:
im not close minded. I understand that this stuff goes on. Things like the patriot act are nothing new to me.

Ant:

--- Quote from: O.G. Techniec on November 11, 2004, 02:48:01 PM ---Secrets in the white house ant?  :o

no way I wouldve neva thunk it.

Stop being a puppet

--- End quote ---

Seriously, I don't know what side of the issues you stand on except that you like being loud-mouthed, and arrogant.  Everyone knows there are secrets in the whitehouse, but our system of government regulates the difference between open and confidential information.  Stop being an idiot. 

King Tech Quadafi:
I dont have no stand on the issues you talk about, because those are non-issues to me. Youre specific thread is titled "Govt secrecy under Bush" . The purpose of the thread was to villify Bush. This makes you a puppet. Because I dont hear any barking from you about why this system exists that allows for the creation of this kinda shit. Susequently, I dont hear any barking from you about Democrat complicity in this law, I mean they signed up for the Patriot Act. So your whole point is dumb and contradictory. Its like making fun of some ones small dick, when you got one ya self.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version