It's May 14, 2024, 06:58:13 PM
well it's a BIG difference whether between you to kill assholes who invaded your country and fuck everything up and killing harmless people you're currently "liberating"..
^ That was the biggest pile of bullshit
And hate is the cause of the terrorist attacks and the cause of a second Bush Presidency. The fact is, the problem isn't with the soldiers, so much as with the leadership who create an atmosphere of intolerance and put us in a situation where events like this one occur unnecessaryily. Its not the fact that this occured, its that it was unnecssary and avoidable. Abu Graib was entirely unavoidable, but poor leadership allowed it to exist. The issue is that these actions, which are unnecesary, are weakening national security, weakening the american economy, and weakening our integrity in the eyes of the rest of the world. That is my issue, and while the US is not your country, it should be the issue on the minds of other americans.
What kind of war has more casualties per day after the war ends than while its going on? Look I'm glad you proudly serve your country, but don't bullshit me that just because you serve in the military you know it all. Anyone that blindly supports Bush loses their right to a credible opinion. I've come on here repeatedly and instead of just spouting personal opinions I've shown you reports, and analysis by republicans and independents. Meanwhile you, nor anyone else on this site, has ever been able to effectively argue against me. The reason you can't is because this time your side is wrong, and your position is completely indefensible. Instead you have to look for ways to discredit the attacks. Richard Clarke is partisan. Michael Scheurer is simply disgruntled. McLaughlin is upset he didn't get to head the CIA. Nobel Laureates are all liberals. The economists don't know whet they are talking about.The way you argue. The only people who are right are the people who side with Bush. Imagine if instead of trying to prove your side right you tried to simply find out what was the truth. Instead you come from a biased position, and your unwilling to change. I was willing to change my opinion for a long time, but not one ever countered the arguements leveled agaisnt Bush. Bush never countered them instead he just deflected, lied, and slandered his opposition. Then you come on here talking like an ignorant asshole that is proud we are 'crushin'g the opposition. We aren't crushing the opposition. We are killing people. We are killing insurgents, and we killing innocent civilians. I don;t have to serve in iraq to tell you that is wrong. If you proudly stand up for the killing of tens of thousands of innocents, if you stand up for the execution of injured insurgents, and the torture of thousands more then fuck off prick no one is proud that you served and have ur medals. I'm proud of the soldier that served their country respectfully and served for the good of their nation and the good of the world. My Father and both of my grandfathers served under the US military. Countlesss men and women have served this country respectfully. But don't tell me that some lil prick that talks about killing like its a football game deserves respect. Everytime I hear you run your motuh about how we are killing and tearin everyoen apart it makes me think that your not different than the guy mentioned in this article.
Javier agreed with me, and he's not of the same religion as me; he's more likely to be of of the same one as you.... so don't bring that bullshit. In your view, all people are evil, want to release their anger, but won't since something inside tells them not to; soldiers on the other hand, are "allowed" to release that anger by raping people, torturing them, etc. First of all, do you really think that all soldiers do that shit? If not, then wouldn't that mean that only the ones that do are "evil"? Why generalize?