Lifestyle > Train of Thought
More Analysis on the 2004 Vote :)
7even:
--- Quote from: *Jamal* on November 19, 2004, 07:33:25 AM ---
--- Quote from: Antonio on November 19, 2004, 07:01:01 AM ---
Yeah, i was replying more to Jamal than to you. ;)
--- End quote ---
I haven't posted in this thread. This is my 1st post, so what the fuck are you claiming to be replying to?
--- End quote ---
LMAO
what a sorry excuse for not getting sarcasm, at least look if Jamal has posted before you make something like that up.. LOL
acbaylove:
--- Quote from: *Jamal* on November 19, 2004, 07:33:25 AM ---
--- Quote from: Antonio on November 19, 2004, 07:01:01 AM ---
Yeah, i was replying more to Jamal than to you. ;)
--- End quote ---
I haven't posted in this thread. This is my 1st post, so what the fuck are you claiming to be replying to?
--- End quote ---
ROFL!! Man soon i'll start having nightmares about you! ;D
Sorry, it was 7even.
acbaylove:
--- Quote from: Ant on November 19, 2004, 07:30:14 AM ---
--- Quote from: Antonio on November 19, 2004, 02:23:53 AM ---
--- Quote from: Ant on November 18, 2004, 11:45:49 PM ---you're not a bush supporter? then why do you come in my threads defending Bush like he is your cousin? you get almost as pissed as engelwood does. seriously, if you dislike threads about Bush, don't read them. literally they take up 1/20th of ur computer screen, you don't have to click and read my threads, i dont read threads that dont' interest me. i suggest you stop doing the same. Now as far as this article goes I read the summary, not the full report because it takes less time to read the summary than to read 8 pages of statistics. According to the summary:
"The data show with 99.0% certainty that a county's use of electronic voting is associated with a disproportionate increase in votes for President Bush."
Ok, now I will admit that my use of the word 'hacked' may have been excessive.
--- End quote ---
Man that's the only shit i dislike about you. Not the articles you quote. But the comment you sometimes add by yourself. Like Afghanistan not producing opium with Talibans and Bush being the one to blame, or like this analys that "suggests 04 vote may have been hacked". I mean if you post this article in full it's ok, if i wanna read it i will. But when you add those comments, be sure of what you write, or you get paranoid and i dont trust you no more. You know what i mean? I'm not defending Bush. Actually i replied only to 2 of your topics about him, the last 2. The reasons?
1- Cause i've read that document by Costas before you.
2- Cause i've read the word "hacked", and i knew it wasnt possible for an University to prove it, when thousands of lawyers didnt.
That's it. Continue to make all the topics you want, but please.. be careful when you comment things and blame people. Cool?
--- End quote ---
Ok agreed, and understood.
--- End quote ---
:)
*Jamal*:
--- Quote from: Antonio on November 19, 2004, 08:18:17 AM ---ROFL!! Man soon i'll start having nightmares about you! ;D
--- End quote ---
That seems to be the fate of those who attempt to TOT-Battle me 8)
7even:
--- Quote from: Antonio on November 19, 2004, 08:18:17 AM ---
--- Quote from: *Jamal* on November 19, 2004, 07:33:25 AM ---
--- Quote from: Antonio on November 19, 2004, 07:01:01 AM ---
Yeah, i was replying more to Jamal than to you. ;)
--- End quote ---
I haven't posted in this thread. This is my 1st post, so what the fuck are you claiming to be replying to?
--- End quote ---
ROFL!! Man soon i'll start having nightmares about you! ;D
Sorry, it was 7even.
--- End quote ---
In that case, lol, yes the spanish dudes were hardcore against the war and their former leader didnt give a shit.
Still, Berlusconi is known for 3 things:
- being an asshole
- being curupt
- being a bush-stan
fits if you ask me.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version