Lifestyle > Train of Thought
More Analysis on the 2004 Vote :)
Woodrow:
--- Quote from: Ant on November 19, 2004, 05:17:27 PM ---lol did i hurt your feelings?
--- End quote ---
Yes. Stupid people make me angry.
Ant:
lol unfortunately in your world all the smart people are stupid. u seem to hate nobel laureates, former government officials, and even moderate republicans.
Woodrow:
--- Quote from: Woodrow on November 19, 2004, 05:23:41 PM ---Try refuting the points in my post; not changing the subject, acting shocked, and posting your pseudo-intellectual "comebacks"
--- End quote ---
You can't do it can you...
Ant:
yes this is simply refuted. I never said I fully agree with the findings in this report. I just said here is more analysis. I'm not a statistician and neither are you. I've said before, I don't believe everything I post is 100% factually correct. I believe that I have posted some arguments that are very strong, and some that are less so. My point has never been that one report proves Bush is bad for america. My point has been that an overwhelming amount of evidence, and analysis suggests his policies are bad for our country. I've gone through these things before. And actually I said a long time ago. I expect bush supporters to duck the stronger arguments and attack the weaker ones and then declare victory.
I really don't know how reliable this report is that is why I called it 'analysis' not 'fact'. but it is conducted by a member of the NAS, inconjunction with one of our more respected universities. But either way, I'd say nobel laureates, prominent republicans, and barrage of well regarded economists, and so on offer stronger arguments than this. The fact is, you have never considered anything i've posted credible because you are so blindly in support of Bush.
My stronger arguments exist in past posts, you ducked those because you can't say anything. I'm not going to be right all of the time, but it certainly beats your record of being right only rarely, but almost always i'm sure in your own opinion. It's clear you the most bigotted, arrogant, and far right member of this board, you might be able to give Trauma a good run for his money, but given your record, why bother having a discussion with you. you had your chances to argue with me like a respectable human being, instead you choose to argue like a republicans: run from the facts, spout rhetoric, yell louder to prove your points, and so on.
Woodrow:
--- Quote from: Ant on November 19, 2004, 05:39:49 PM ---yes this is simply refuted. I never said I fully agree with the findings in this report. I just said here is more analysis. I'm not a statistician and neither are you. I've said before, I don't believe everything I post is 100% factually correct. I believe that I have posted some arguments that are very strong, and some that are less so. My point has never been that one report proves Bush is bad for america. My point has been that an overwhelming amount of evidence, and analysis suggests his policies are bad for our country. I've gone through these things before. And actually I said a long time ago. I expect bush supporters to duck the stronger arguments and attack the weaker ones and then declare victory.
I really don't know how reliable this report is that is why I called it 'analysis' not 'fact'. but it is conducted by a member of the NAS, inconjunction with one of our more respected universities. But either way, I'd say nobel laureates, prominent republicans, and barrage of well regarded economists, and so on offer stronger arguments than this. The fact is, you have never considered anything i've posted credible because you are so blindly in support of Bush.
My stronger arguments exist in past posts, you ducked those because you can't say anything. I'm not going to be right all of the time, but it certainly beats your record of being right only rarely, but almost always i'm sure in your own opinion. It's clear you the most bigotted, arrogant, and far right member of this board, you might be able to give Trauma a good run for his money, but given your record, why bother having a discussion with you. you had your chances to argue with me like a respectable human being, instead you choose to argue like a republicans: run from the facts, spout rhetoric, yell louder to prove your points, and so on.
--- End quote ---
LOL!
How does your opinion that Bush is bad for America have ANYTHING to do with the broke ass report you posted?
How do "Nobel laureates, prominent republicans, and barrage of well regarded economists" have ANYTHING to do with the broke ass report you posted?
Hold up a second ant... I'm gonna go post a bunch of shit I don't agree with. SURREEEEEEEE....
It's funny how you label me a bigot, arrogant, member of this board when we've had LIMITED interaction over the INTERNET!
Tell me how you got to know me so well and how you found out that I'm a bigot!? Isn't your party the one of acceptance and understanding? If so, why are you so quick to label others? It just boggles my mind the hoops you jump through.
How do you know I'm not a statistician?
By the way: You should have said: It's clear you ARE the most bigoted, arrogant etc...the most bigoted, arrogant etc...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version