Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Is the U.S. really the most generous nation?
Woodrow:
--- Quote from: Ant on January 05, 2005, 03:13:25 PM ---Are you retarded? This whole post is about government sponsored foreign aid, and first you changed topics by citing citizen sponsored foreign aid, now your citing citizen sponsored charitable contributions in general. That 241 billion you cited is made up of charitable contributions to organizations WITHIN the United States. Why you think that applies to this argument is beyond me. You are comparing apples to oranges.
--- End quote ---
You are the biggest moron on this board. Hands down.
First you complain about the government spending TOO much money in other posts, now you're claiming they don't spend enough? Which is it? Why should the government give out aid when it's clear that our private citizens do a much better job at it?
Woodrow:
Ant:
--- Quote from: Woodrow on January 05, 2005, 04:40:36 PM ---
--- Quote from: Ant on January 05, 2005, 03:13:25 PM ---Are you retarded? This whole post is about government sponsored foreign aid, and first you changed topics by citing citizen sponsored foreign aid, now your citing citizen sponsored charitable contributions in general. That 241 billion you cited is made up of charitable contributions to organizations WITHIN the United States. Why you think that applies to this argument is beyond me. You are comparing apples to oranges.
--- End quote ---
You are the biggest moron on this board. Hands down.
First you complain about the government spending TOO much money in other posts, now you're claiming they don't spend enough? Which is it? Why should the government give out aid when it's clear that our private citizens do a much better job at it?
--- End quote ---
Again your making up arguments I've never made. I said previously I could argue giving aid is a bad thing.. I was only pointing out a common misconception. You were the one that prominently reposted my initial post in large font. If you read it you would have seen I never complained that we don't give a lot and actually said the opposite. In fact I was explicit that this post was primarily about pointing out misconceptions. Now, I've caught you about three times in this post saying things that were not correct, of course your arrogance prevents you from admitting you could possibly be wrong.
Thirteen:
--- Quote from: Woodrow on January 05, 2005, 04:41:23 PM ---
--- End quote ---
fuck
*Jamal*:
^ LMAO @ that pic...
Why is Tech listed twice? Cloning gone wrong?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version