Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Bush Inauguration Protests PHOTOS
Woodrow:
:stupid:
Ant:
--- Quote from: Woodrow on January 23, 2005, 08:48:17 PM --- :stupid:
--- End quote ---
You obviously have a hard time understanding simple concepts, but I should know this by now, let me simplify for you since too many words often confuse you.
Woodrow: Look at these numbers that prove Bush voters are smart
Ant: Look at your innacurate numbers based on exit-polls that predicted JK the winner of the presidential election
Woodrow: Yes, but exit polls are "nearly always going to be less accurate" of course they are revised post election to better reflect reality.
Ant: Yes, but the data you gave a) doesn't have a source and b) is pre-final count and has not been revised. There are also issues with survey construction which haven't been addressed.
Woodrow: ???
Ant: So exit polls that are "nearly always going to be less accurate" are a reliable source of information?
Woodrow (hypothetical answer): well no, unless of course they agree with a republican point of view.
Woodrow:
--- Quote from: Ant on January 23, 2005, 08:55:48 PM ---
--- Quote from: Woodrow on January 23, 2005, 08:48:17 PM --- :stupid:
--- End quote ---
You obviously have a hard time understanding simple concepts, but I should know this by now, let me simplify for you since too many words often confuse you.
Woodrow: Look at these numbers that prove Bush voters are smart
Ant: Look at your innacurate numbers based on exit-polls that predicted JK the winner of the presidential election
Woodrow: Yes, but exit polls are "nearly always going to be less accurate" of course they are revised post election to better reflect reality.
Ant: Yes, but the data you gave a) doesn't have a source and b) is pre-final count and has not been revised. There are also issues with survey construction which haven't been addressed.
Woodrow: ???
Ant: So exit polls that are "nearly always going to be less accurate" are a reliable source of information?
Woodrow (hypothetical answer): well no, unless of course they agree with a republican point of view.
--- End quote ---
Holy shit. You're more ignorant than I thought.
If they revise the data to more accuratley represent the election, then how is this data erronious? The poll numbers I posted are within a half percentage point of the actual results.
Ant:
--- Quote from: Woodrow on January 23, 2005, 09:11:41 PM ---
--- Quote from: Ant on January 23, 2005, 08:55:48 PM ---
--- Quote from: Woodrow on January 23, 2005, 08:48:17 PM --- :stupid:
--- End quote ---
You obviously have a hard time understanding simple concepts, but I should know this by now, let me simplify for you since too many words often confuse you.
Woodrow: Look at these numbers that prove Bush voters are smart
Ant: Look at your innacurate numbers based on exit-polls that predicted JK the winner of the presidential election
Woodrow: Yes, but exit polls are "nearly always going to be less accurate" of course they are revised post election to better reflect reality.
Ant: Yes, but the data you gave a) doesn't have a source and b) is pre-final count and has not been revised. There are also issues with survey construction which haven't been addressed.
Woodrow: ???
Ant: So exit polls that are "nearly always going to be less accurate" are a reliable source of information?
Woodrow (hypothetical answer): well no, unless of course they agree with a republican point of view.
--- End quote ---
Holy shit. You're more ignorant than I thought.
If they revise the data to more accuratley represent the election, then how is this data erronious? The poll numbers I posted are within a half percentage point of the actual results.
--- End quote ---
No your more ignorant than I thought!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version