Lifestyle > Train of Thought
A Historic Day The Kyoto Protocol Comes Into Force For 141 Countries
Don Rizzle:
--- Quote from: Needles Kane on February 16, 2005, 02:15:31 PM ---
--- Quote from: Don Rizzle on February 16, 2005, 01:56:06 PM ---even if they don't meet their targets the fact is atleast they are trying to cut emmissions rather than not caring about the issue at all
--- End quote ---
so if america signed the treaty but then did little to back it up...at least they'd be trying and most of the people here could get the stick out of their ass?
'fraid not
--- End quote ---
no it would have to be a genuine effort
Woodrow:
--- Quote from: Don Rizzle on February 16, 2005, 02:25:16 PM ---
--- Quote from: Needles Kane on February 16, 2005, 02:15:31 PM ---
--- Quote from: Don Rizzle on February 16, 2005, 01:56:06 PM ---even if they don't meet their targets the fact is atleast they are trying to cut emmissions rather than not caring about the issue at all
--- End quote ---
so if america signed the treaty but then did little to back it up...at least they'd be trying and most of the people here could get the stick out of their ass?
'fraid not
--- End quote ---
no it would have to be a genuine effort
--- End quote ---
You got served last time you brought this up. Why talk about it again?
Don Rizzle:
--- Quote from: Woodrow on February 16, 2005, 02:26:27 PM ---
--- Quote from: Don Rizzle on February 16, 2005, 02:25:16 PM ---
--- Quote from: Needles Kane on February 16, 2005, 02:15:31 PM ---
--- Quote from: Don Rizzle on February 16, 2005, 01:56:06 PM ---even if they don't meet their targets the fact is atleast they are trying to cut emmissions rather than not caring about the issue at all
--- End quote ---
so if america signed the treaty but then did little to back it up...at least they'd be trying and most of the people here could get the stick out of their ass?
'fraid not
--- End quote ---
no it would have to be a genuine effort
--- End quote ---
You got served last time you brought this up. Why talk about it again?
--- End quote ---
1 no i didn't, 2 i talk about this again because it became legally binding for those countries that ratified it. your excuse was not all countries participate so why bother which is weak especially considering with american involvment we'd have 80% of the worlds pollutors involved in making steps to cut emmissions. also since the last discussion on the topic there have been numerous reports that previous predictions on emmissions levels under estimated the effects these are causeing. i'd like you you to come up with a reasonable arguement to for supporting the world worst pollutor or get the fuck out of this topic as you obviously don't belong here because you have been been brainwashed to believe that emmissions have no negative effect when there is plenty of evidence to show current effects OR you just proven why america is so bad its spawned a culture of there always being someone else to blame other than yourselves so you have little willingness to do anything about it unless it directly effects you in the here and now.
Lincoln:
I can't wait to see energy prices rise along with a recession in country while nothing happens!
Trauma-san:
*Sigh.
Canada signed a piece of paper, talked the talk, and increased pollutions by 20%.
America didn't sign the peace of paper, said it was bullshit uninforceable useless nonsense, and all 95 senators voted NOT to sign the treaty, after Clinton wanted to.
If you don't like it, write your congressman. Any of them. They all voted against it, even John Kerry... although he's critical of Bush not signing it.... when they ask Kerry why HE didn't vote for it, he doesn't have an answer, and the press conference is over.
You liberals need to get your shit straight before you accuse and bitch.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version