Lifestyle > Train of Thought

Gay Marriage

<< < (2/7) > >>

Fathom:

--- Quote from: Evil Ryu on February 28, 2005, 04:41:28 PM ---marriage by government... yes (i voted that)

marriage by religion, at least Catholic,my religion HELL NO!!!

--- End quote ---
I understand where you're coming from.

*Jamal*:
NO.

white Boy:

--- Quote from: Lincoln The Reform-A-Tory on February 28, 2005, 04:39:34 PM ---Marriage no. Civil Unions yes.

--- End quote ---

Lincoln:

--- Quote from: Fathom on February 28, 2005, 04:41:17 PM ---
--- Quote from: Lincoln The Reform-A-Tory on February 28, 2005, 04:39:34 PM ---Marriage no. Civil Unions yes.

--- End quote ---
Why so?

--- End quote ---

There is no need to change the definition of marriage. The state should never have been allowed to interfere in marriage in the first place in my opinion. Civil Unions would prevent both hatred towards homosexuals whom would come under fire for changing the definition of marriage, as well as actually protecting the traditional definition, in addition to giving them the same benefits which prevents discrimination.

Sikotic™:

--- Quote from: Lincoln The Reform-A-Tory on February 28, 2005, 04:39:34 PM ---Marriage no. Civil Unions yes.

--- End quote ---

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page