Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Fake News
Ant:
And Now, the Counterfeit News
The Bush administration has come under a lot of criticism for its attempts to fob off government propaganda as genuine news reports. Whether federal agencies are purchasing the services of supposedly independent columnists or making videos extolling White House initiatives and then disguising them as TV news reports, that's wrong. But it is time to acknowledge that the nation's news organizations have played a large and unappetizing role in deceiving the public.
As documented this week in an article in The Times by David Barstow and Robin Stein, more than 20 federal agencies, including the State Department and the Defense Department, now create fake news clips. The Bush administration spent $254 million in its first four years on contracts with public relations firms, more than double the amount spent by the Clinton administration.
Most of these tapes are very skillfully done, including "interviews" that seem genuine and "reporters" who look much like the real thing. Only sophisticated viewers would easily recognize that these videos are actually unpaid commercial announcements for the White House or some other part of the government. Some of the videos clearly cross the line into the proscribed territory of propaganda, and the Government Accountability Office says at least two were illegally distributed.
But too many television stations run government videos anyway, without any hint of where they came from. And while some claim they somehow stumbled accidentally into this trap, it seems obvious that in most cases, television stations that are short on reporters, long on air time to fill and unwilling to spend the money needed for real news gathering are abdicating their editorial responsibilities to the government's publicity teams. Bush administration officials now insist that they carefully label any domestic releases as government handouts.
However disingenuous those assurances may be, in at least some cases the stations are the main culprits in the deception - as at the Fox affiliate in Memphis, where a station reporter narrated a State Department video, using the text that came with it. The Times also reported on a small central Illinois station that was so eager to snap up this low-cost filler that it asked the Agriculture Department to have its "reporter" refer to its morning show in his closing lines. The Times tracked station malpractice into bigger markets, like San Diego (the ABC affiliate) and Louisville, Ky. (the Fox affiliate).
If using pretend news is one of the ways these stations have chosen to save money, it's a false economy. If it represents a political decision to support President Bush, it will eventually backfire. This kind of practice cheapens the real commodity that television stations have to sell during their news hours: their credibility.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/16/opinion/16wed1.html?hp=&pagewanted=print&position=
nibs:
let's take one step back.
the fox news channel is fake news. even the pure news content on that network is slanted. the teasers for their news stories are slanted. the mojority of the political analysis shows in general are extraordinarily biased. columnists and editors at major news papers are slanted so much in both directions that it is hard to take that seriously as well.
people seem to have ths attitude that if you read two biased views of the same topic each way it balances out and you understand the story. no. it's just confusing as you don't know what to believe at all.
i don't see how the white house's fake news reports are any worse than the fox news channel as a whole.
Ant:
--- Quote from: nibs on March 16, 2005, 05:56:20 AM ---i don't see how the white house's fake news reports are any worse than the fox news channel as a whole.
--- End quote ---
well for one... fox news is privately funded while Bush News is publicly funded. Or in otherwords, they are using 250 million dollars in taxpayer money to spread propaganda and given that the government abuse of taxpayer dollars seems to be the frequent rallying cry of the republican party its almost humorously hypocritical that stuff of this nature is tolerated.
Altho hypocrisy doesn't seem to be a vice that concerns most modern republicans.
nibs:
Ant:
well for one... fox news is privately funded while Bush News is publicly funded. Or in otherwords, they are using 250 million dollars in taxpayer money to spread propaganda and given that the government abuse of taxpayer dollars seems to be the frequent rallying cry of the republican party its almost humorously hypocritical that stuff of this nature is tolerated.
we don't disagree. but the news media in general has a credibility problem across the board. and as for the hypocrisy of the bush administration and republican party:
a) the democrats are only fractionally better.
b) these shenanigans that the bush administration is transparent, but most people don't seem to care. why shouldn't the bush administration engage in practices that they know they can get away with.
american politics isn't about honesty. it's about wrestling power, passing legislation and pushing agenda's forward. the bush administration has been very effective at this. their use of propoganda has been very effective.
i'm amused at how the bush opponents are outraged at every turn; it's business as usual with this guy and this administration.
Fathom:
--- Quote from: nibs on March 16, 2005, 05:56:20 AM ---let's take one step back.
the fox news channel is fake news. even the pure news content on that network is slanted. the teasers for their news stories are slanted. the mojority of the political analysis shows in general are extraordinarily biased. columnists and editors at major news papers are slanted so much in both directions that it is hard to take that seriously as well.
people seem to have ths attitude that if you read two biased views of the same topic each way it balances out and you understand the story. no. it's just confusing as you don't know what to believe at all.
i don't see how the white house's fake news reports are any worse than the fox news channel as a whole.
--- End quote ---
Every news station has some type of slant. Fox has a right wing bias. Every other news station has a left wing bias.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version