Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
WWE Signs Marty Janetty
Perfection:
--- Quote from: Shallow on March 22, 2005, 03:38:07 PM ---
--- Quote from: Perfection on March 22, 2005, 01:24:15 PM ---
By the way Kane is considered to be one of the best wrestlers who are big.
--- End quote ---
No he isn't. Terry Gordy, Bam Bam Bigelow, Vader, Bruiser Brody, Stan Hansen, Giant Baba, Ray Taylor in his early years, and maybe Blackjack Mulligan. Kane is in the same boat as Sid, Undertaker, Big Show, Snitzky, Ron Reese, and JBL. Big men who suck in the ring. I don't know anyone who considers Kane a good worker, outside of you.
--- End quote ---
Back at the Armmageddon PPV when it was Kane vs Goldberg vs HHH most people say Kane made that match because he looked & worked the best out of tose three.
The Undertaker is considered to be one of the greatest big men wrestlers of all time by legends of the business like Bret Hart. "Undertaker. Despite his Frankenstein gimmick, Mark Callaway is a solid, convincing, steady, reliable wrestler."
When Bret was taking about some of the greats of the 20th century none of the big men you mentioned are on his list. He put Undertaker with the likes of Pipper, Henning, Dynamite Kid, Dory Funk Jr, Nelson Royal, Buddy Rogers, Leo Burke, Archie The Stomper Gouldie, Harley Race, Cowboy Bob Orton, Perdro Morales, Antonio Inoki. And he says Kurt Angle is the best today.
Shallow:
--- Quote from: Perfection on March 24, 2005, 09:30:47 PM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on March 22, 2005, 03:38:07 PM ---
--- Quote from: Perfection on March 22, 2005, 01:24:15 PM ---
By the way Kane is considered to be one of the best wrestlers who are big.
--- End quote ---
No he isn't. Terry Gordy, Bam Bam Bigelow, Vader, Bruiser Brody, Stan Hansen, Giant Baba, Ray Taylor in his early years, and maybe Blackjack Mulligan. Kane is in the same boat as Sid, Undertaker, Big Show, Snitzky, Ron Reese, and JBL. Big men who suck in the ring. I don't know anyone who considers Kane a good worker, outside of you.
--- End quote ---
Back at the Armmageddon PPV when it was Kane vs Goldberg vs HHH most people say Kane made that match because he looked & worked the best out of tose three.
The Undertaker is considered to be one of the greatest big men wrestlers of all time by legends of the business like Bret Hart. "Undertaker. Despite his Frankenstein gimmick, Mark Callaway is a solid, convincing, steady, reliable wrestler."
When Bret was taking about some of the greats of the 20th century none of the big men you mentioned are on his list. He put Undertaker with the likes of Pipper, Henning, Dynamite Kid, Dory Funk Jr, Nelson Royal, Buddy Rogers, Leo Burke, Archie The Stomper Gouldie, Harley Race, Cowboy Bob Orton, Perdro Morales, Antonio Inoki. And he says Kurt Angle is the best today.
--- End quote ---
All I know is that when Kane or Taker are in their with average or bad wrestlers, the matches suck. If Taker was so good then his championship match with JBL wouldn't have sucked so bad. The crowd was doing the wave during the match just keep themselves entertained. As for Kane, watch how avergae his match with Benoit was from last year. If Benoit is in a bad match then that means his opponent is really bad. Of course Bret is going to praise Taker since they're friends and Taker was ready to back him after the screw job in Montreal.
-Euthanasia-:
--- Quote from: AlerG on March 24, 2005, 02:01:47 PM ---that shockmaster video isn't working it's only the audio, peace.
--- End quote ---
the vid didnt work for me either when i selected open, but when i selected save, it did. try that plz
Perfection:
--- Quote from: Shallow on March 25, 2005, 08:37:49 AM ---
--- Quote from: Perfection on March 24, 2005, 09:30:47 PM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on March 22, 2005, 03:38:07 PM ---
--- Quote from: Perfection on March 22, 2005, 01:24:15 PM ---
By the way Kane is considered to be one of the best wrestlers who are big.
--- End quote ---
No he isn't. Terry Gordy, Bam Bam Bigelow, Vader, Bruiser Brody, Stan Hansen, Giant Baba, Ray Taylor in his early years, and maybe Blackjack Mulligan. Kane is in the same boat as Sid, Undertaker, Big Show, Snitzky, Ron Reese, and JBL. Big men who suck in the ring. I don't know anyone who considers Kane a good worker, outside of you.
--- End quote ---
Back at the Armmageddon PPV when it was Kane vs Goldberg vs HHH most people say Kane made that match because he looked & worked the best out of tose three.
The Undertaker is considered to be one of the greatest big men wrestlers of all time by legends of the business like Bret Hart. "Undertaker. Despite his Frankenstein gimmick, Mark Callaway is a solid, convincing, steady, reliable wrestler."
When Bret was taking about some of the greats of the 20th century none of the big men you mentioned are on his list. He put Undertaker with the likes of Pipper, Henning, Dynamite Kid, Dory Funk Jr, Nelson Royal, Buddy Rogers, Leo Burke, Archie The Stomper Gouldie, Harley Race, Cowboy Bob Orton, Perdro Morales, Antonio Inoki. And he says Kurt Angle is the best today.
--- End quote ---
All I know is that when Kane or Taker are in their with average or bad wrestlers, the matches suck. If Taker was so good then his championship match with JBL wouldn't have sucked so bad. The crowd was doing the wave during the match just keep themselves entertained. As for Kane, watch how avergae his match with Benoit was from last year. If Benoit is in a bad match then that means his opponent is really bad. Of course Bret is going to praise Taker since they're friends and Taker was ready to back him after the screw job in Montreal.
--- End quote ---
Obvisously you didn't see any of his Hell in the Cell matches. And Taker must still be doing something right because he's the most popular guy in the WWE. Ric Flair even says Taker was one of the best big men ever.
Shallow:
--- Quote from: Perfection on March 25, 2005, 11:41:38 PM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on March 25, 2005, 08:37:49 AM ---
--- Quote from: Perfection on March 24, 2005, 09:30:47 PM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on March 22, 2005, 03:38:07 PM ---
--- Quote from: Perfection on March 22, 2005, 01:24:15 PM ---
By the way Kane is considered to be one of the best wrestlers who are big.
--- End quote ---
No he isn't. Terry Gordy, Bam Bam Bigelow, Vader, Bruiser Brody, Stan Hansen, Giant Baba, Ray Taylor in his early years, and maybe Blackjack Mulligan. Kane is in the same boat as Sid, Undertaker, Big Show, Snitzky, Ron Reese, and JBL. Big men who suck in the ring. I don't know anyone who considers Kane a good worker, outside of you.
--- End quote ---
Back at the Armmageddon PPV when it was Kane vs Goldberg vs HHH most people say Kane made that match because he looked & worked the best out of tose three.
The Undertaker is considered to be one of the greatest big men wrestlers of all time by legends of the business like Bret Hart. "Undertaker. Despite his Frankenstein gimmick, Mark Callaway is a solid, convincing, steady, reliable wrestler."
When Bret was taking about some of the greats of the 20th century none of the big men you mentioned are on his list. He put Undertaker with the likes of Pipper, Henning, Dynamite Kid, Dory Funk Jr, Nelson Royal, Buddy Rogers, Leo Burke, Archie The Stomper Gouldie, Harley Race, Cowboy Bob Orton, Perdro Morales, Antonio Inoki. And he says Kurt Angle is the best today.
--- End quote ---
All I know is that when Kane or Taker are in their with average or bad wrestlers, the matches suck. If Taker was so good then his championship match with JBL wouldn't have sucked so bad. The crowd was doing the wave during the match just keep themselves entertained. As for Kane, watch how avergae his match with Benoit was from last year. If Benoit is in a bad match then that means his opponent is really bad. Of course Bret is going to praise Taker since they're friends and Taker was ready to back him after the screw job in Montreal.
--- End quote ---
Obvisously you didn't see any of his Hell in the Cell matches. And Taker must still be doing something right because he's the most popular guy in the WWE. Ric Flair even says Taker was one of the best big men ever.
--- End quote ---
Hell in a cell was a gimmick match, and the first time he was in there with HBK would carried the whole match. The second time it was Foley who bumbed around so much there is no way the match would not be entertaining. Taker is not THE most popular guy right now, it's between Cena, or Flair. Taker just seems more over because of his rare appearances. Just because he is over doesn't mean he's good in the ring. Hogan was nevcer that great and neither was Warrior. McMahon sucks in the ring but he's over huge everytime he comes out. Ric Flair also says HHH is the greatest wrestler alive today, and in interviews calls him one of the best ever.
Are you telling me that when you watch his matches with Booker, JBL, Heidenreich, Dupree, etc, you think this guy can work in the ring. He lives off of gimmick spots. Eddy is a great wrestler. Benoit is a great wrestler. Angle is a great wrestler (not as great as he was before his neck injury). Taker is a big fat gimmick with little wrrestling skill.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version