Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Should Uefa change the ruling? (( Everton & Liverpool scenario))
...'BfCfC'...:
--- Quote from: Mac_10 on April 25, 2005, 02:01:27 PM ---if the situation arises - both should qualify i.m.o. both would deserve to be there
--- End quote ---
yep
but i dont think liverpool are going to win the cl
Mac 10 †:
--- Quote from: ...'BfCfC'... on April 25, 2005, 02:04:37 PM ---
--- Quote from: Mac_10 on April 25, 2005, 02:01:27 PM ---if the situation arises - both should qualify i.m.o. both would deserve to be there
--- End quote ---
yep
but i dont think liverpool are going to win the cl
--- End quote ---
me neither
Woozie:
alot of people thought porto shudnt deserve to win eufa cup, same thing happened with greece but they won it man
brazil r havin to gain qualification for germany 2006 by the way so same could b applied 2 liverpool...
Mindless Minority:
They were discussing it on Talksport this morning. England should be given another CL spot, but that is not happening so if Liverpool did win then it should go to them. Tough on Everton but shit happens.
Let's not get carried away anyway, chances of Liverpool beating Chelsea and AC Milan are pretty slim.
TheDeli:
I think that the previous winners of the CL (or UEFA cup if not in CL) should always be able to defend their trophy, and I believe if you win the CL its a bigger achievement than finishing 4th in your respective league so you should go into the better competition the following season.
Yes it shall be a shame for everton if it happens and will mean lost revenue, but finishing 4th in a league imo shouldn't intitle you to be a part of the biggest club competition in the world.
The CL should still just be for respective league champions and previous winners, not up to 4th place in some leagues, its wrong when smaller countries champions don't even qualify for the CL & have to make do with the UEFA cup and because you come 4th in one of the bigger nations leagues you qualify for the CL
But to UEFA its about the £'s
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version