Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

Come up with actual good reasons on why Nash was deserving of the MVP

<< < (2/10) > >>

7even:
Let's be serious. Noone deserved it more. I don't even want to come up with good reasons because the reasons are obvious. Knowing that, I know that you don't regard them as good reasons, since you must know 'em. Therefore there's no need.

Javier:
just because Duncan didnt have the luxury to be a FA and move to a team with two superstars doesnt mean its a good reason for Nash.  Stats dont lie...there were at least 4 more valueable players than Nash

wcsoldier:

--- Quote from: Javier on May 12, 2005, 05:46:23 AM ---just because Duncan didnt have the luxury to be a FA and move to a team with two superstars doesnt mean its a good reason for Nash.  Stats dont lie...there were at least 4 more valueable players than Nash

--- End quote ---
  Duncan has 2 MVP titles. He doesn't need a third plus he's gonna win the NBA title. Why so much people discredit Nash ?. I give u three possibilities , u can choose : they are racist , they never watched a Suns game this year or simply they don't know shit about basketball and the predominant role of the point guard  8)
                                                                     

Perfection:

--- Quote from: Javier on May 12, 2005, 05:46:23 AM ---just because Duncan didnt have the luxury to be a FA and move to a team with two superstars doesnt mean its a good reason for Nash.  Stats dont lie...there were at least 4 more valueable players than Nash

--- End quote ---

Nash signed with the Suns who were the wrost team in the Western Conference last year. The only had 29 wins. The first losing streak the Suns went on when they lost 5 or 6 games in a row, Nash wasn't in any of them. Nash made a greater impact on his team more than anyone else. He got the Suns to a better record than the Spurs.

You obvisously didn't watch any Suns' game, or you don't like a PG winning the ward, or you don't like a white guy winning the award.
And if you fall under that last category, then you need some serious help.

Steve Nash won the MVP because he was the most valueable player to his team. He had he greatest impact on his team more than anyone else had on their own team.

Case Closed. There are no good reasons to  argue that Nash didn't deserve the award.

Javier:
So what if Duncan has 2 MVp titles already, if you look at the roland ratings he was the most valueable to the team.  His impact was felt the most when he wasnt on the court



--- Quote ---You obvisously didn't watch any Suns' game, or you don't like a PG winning the ward, or you don't like a white guy winning the award.
--- End quote ---

Yeah i really dont like a white guy winning the award  :-\  Come on.

if Nash was so deserving of this MVp, then Kidd was straight out robbed the year he joined the Nets.  The On Court off court numbers is a better indicator how the team performs with that player is on and off the court than Wins and Losses, its such a small sample size.  The whole look at the difference from last year to this year is bullshit.  Its not what newcomer improved their team the most but who is the best in the NBA.  Its not most valueble to the team but to the Leauge, so its the Best Player in the NBA for that season. and the three best players i nthe NBA is Duncan, Garnett and Shaq right now...its not even debateable

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version