Lifestyle > Train of Thought

Newsweek Is Not Alone

<< < (4/7) > >>

Don Rizzle:

--- Quote from: Woodrow on May 17, 2005, 02:37:41 PM ---
--- Quote from: Don Rizzle on May 17, 2005, 11:33:53 AM ---maybe it wasn't gramatically correct and the spelling wasn't great but hey my post never are, this is old ground your not going to get me to make an effort just to impress you. you are no better than me, your points are no more valid than mine because they maybe constructed in the queens english (well american bastardised english).  if you couldn't understand what i said in my origional post i suggest you go back to school.

The bush administration was very critical of newsweek, if you don't believe political pressure (direct or indirect) led to the retraction then you really are nieve....if you want me to explain it in simpler terms and go through the chain of events i'll be happy to do that for you.


--- End quote ---

I am better than you because my points are based on common sense.

--- End quote ---
it only takes an oz of common sense to understand politicians don't always tell the truth and you sometimes have to read between the lines.
also newsweek's retraction wasnt a full and frank retraction, it was a very weak one...

Woodrow:

--- Quote from: Don Rizzle on May 17, 2005, 03:03:15 PM ---it only takes an oz of common sense to understand politicians don't always tell the truth and you sometimes have to read between the lines.
also newsweek's retraction wasnt a full and frank retraction, it was a very weak one...

--- End quote ---
How are you gonna tell me to read between the lines when you struggle to read?!

Ant:

--- Quote from: PayPuh on May 17, 2005, 02:53:59 PM ---
--- Quote from: Ant on May 17, 2005, 12:22:12 PM ---You continue to ignore the fact that Newsweek recieved approval from the Pentago to run this story before printing it.
--- End quote ---

No they didn't. I saw the interview they had with the Newsweek guy. They said the Pentagon didn't even respond when they sent the article in. They waited like 11 days for an okay, but nothing, so they printed it. I would have done the same if I didn't get any response, but you have to admit, there is a difference.

--- End quote ---

I read they recieved approval, but if that is the case I stand corrected.

Ant:
Desecration of Koran Had Been Reported Before

By Carol D. Leonnig
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, May 18, 2005; Page A12

Newsweek magazine's now-retracted story that a military guard at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, flushed a copy of the Koran down a toilet has sparked angry denunciations by the White House and the Pentagon, which have linked the article to Muslim riots and deaths abroad.

But American and international media have widely reported similar allegations from detainees and others of desecration of the Muslim holy book for more than two years.

----

The story has been around for months as I've said multiple times, and still the bigots are arguing what happened in Afghanistan is entirely the fault of Newsweek. Hysterical.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/17/AR2005051701315.html

Woodrow:

--- Quote from: Ant on May 17, 2005, 07:26:24 PM ---Time and time again you tried to pretend I'm arguing about the veracity of this story when that has never been the case.

--- End quote ---
:eh:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version