Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Newsweek Is Not Alone
King Tech Quadafi:
--- Quote from: Needles Kane on May 18, 2005, 10:11:34 AM ---
--- Quote from: The Imam on May 18, 2005, 02:43:27 AM ---
--- Quote from: PayPuh on May 17, 2005, 11:55:40 AM ---Either way you look at it, the story being true or not, people were murdered over a fucking book. Yeah, so US troops were flushing pages of the Quaran down the toilet? At least they aren't driving cars full of explosives into the middle of a crowd, killing their own people. I mean, some of yall act like tearing pages out of a book is the worst thing ever. They are trying to interagate people who murder.
And what would happen if they captured a US troop? Give them hot tea and a bath? Fuck no. They would kill them.
And no one here can talk. The troops are over there worried about getting shot or blown up everyday. They aren't over their trying to convert people to christianity, they are over there to bring some stability to a place full of poverty. People just don't understand, the quicker they can get a working government up and a full police force, the US troops will almost all leave. The Iraqis don't want them there, and I'm sure the troops don't want to be there. But no, they can't make this easier.
--- End quote ---
Yeah, atleast the US Military never kills anybody. And they are actually in Iraq to relieve poverty by stealing all their oil revunue. And the country doesn't have electricity much anymore, but hey, it's all the fault of the insurgents.
Yeah, atleast the US Soldiers aren't killing anybody, right?
--- End quote ---
hey crazy ass cracker. wasn't Sadaam stealing all the oil revanue... oooooh but your muslim ass wasn't complaining about that probably because allah was punishing the iraqis with starvation and sadaam was just doing allah's will
can't you make one post without saying something totally retarded?
--- End quote ---
Cracker, what u fail to realize is NO ONE WAS DEFENDING SADDAM. BUT U DUMB HICKS ARE DEFENDING BUSH?!?!?!?
Don Rizzle:
basically saddam and bush both fucked over iraq in their own ways, however now its been done we can't change that so I hope we can move on, the coalition is there to stay until there is calm, the insurgency only prolongs the occupation and is punishing the ordinary iraqi citizens. but its a game of give and take americans shouldn't be so antagonistic and heavy handed, they should really be looking to follow the british example which although is not perfect (it never will be) I believe we have played a positive role in our effort to rebuild iraq and keep calm.
TraceOneInfinite:
--- Quote from: Don Rizzle on May 18, 2005, 04:14:24 PM ---basically saddam and bush both fucked over iraq in their own ways, however now its been done we can't change that so I hope we can move on, the coalition is there to stay until there is calm, the insurgency only prolongs the occupation and is punishing the ordinary iraqi citizens. but its a game of give and take americans shouldn't be so antagonistic and heavy handed, they should really be looking to follow the british example which although is not perfect (it never will be) I believe we have played a positive role in our effort to rebuild iraq and keep calm.
--- End quote ---
You got it backwards, the occupation only prolongs the insurgency, don't get it twisted! Al Sadr is a Shiite Imam and his family was historically oppressed by Saddaam Hussien's regime, and his assesment was just this, "The little serpent is out and the big serpent is in."
Woodrow:
--- Quote from: The Imam on May 18, 2005, 04:35:40 PM ---You got it backwards, the occupation only prolongs the insurgency, don't get it twisted! Al Sadr is a Shiite Imam and his family was historically oppressed by Saddaam Hussien's regime, and his assesment was just this, "The little serpent is out and the big serpent is in."
--- End quote ---
Why do you even try and contribute to any discussion? It makes you look like an even bigger moron.
Remember when you thought these terrorists weren't being paid and you laughed and laughed at my statement? I provided you with proof, and you deleted your post.
Now you're talking like Al Sadr is a legitimate politican.
Let's take a look at the man you've quoted:
Al-Sadr linked to mass killings
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20040901-124008-3160r.htm\
Al-Sadr's aide: keep captured female soldiers as slaves
http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/news/5704-iraq-slaves.html
Al-Sadr's men selling heroin
http://www.washingtontimes.com/world/20041011-123953-3820r.htm
You haven't got a clue what's going on in Iraq, but that's the least of your worries.
Low Key:
--- Quote from: King Techniec on May 18, 2005, 01:58:49 PM ---
Cracker, what u fail to realize is NO ONE WAS DEFENDING SADDAM. BUT U DUMB HICKS ARE DEFENDING BUSH?!?!?!?
--- End quote ---
Who here is defending Bush? I'm defending common sense and decency. Saddam was a crazy asshole. So is Bush, but at least he isn't gassing his own people.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version