Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Newsweek Is Not Alone
Woodrow:
--- Quote from: Don Rizzle on May 17, 2005, 10:14:47 AM ---if u believe that retraction your a bigger fool than i thaught! of course they were gonna retract it after the reaction it caused in the middle east I would be HUGELY suprised if this story was not true. Of course Bush will deny it too, just like he will deny torture, lying etc. its standard practise, because if he didn't the reaction would be a whole lot worse THIS IS ALL CALLED DAMAGE CONTROL YOU FUCKING ZOMBIE
--- End quote ---
thaught? suprised? practise?
Yeah. I'm the fool.
Don Rizzle:
--- Quote from: Woodrow on May 17, 2005, 10:17:37 AM ---
--- Quote from: Don Rizzle on May 17, 2005, 10:14:47 AM ---if u believe that retraction your a bigger fool than i thaught! of course they were gonna retract it after the reaction it caused in the middle east I would be HUGELY suprised if this story was not true. Of course Bush will deny it too, just like he will deny torture, lying etc. its standard practise, because if he didn't the reaction would be a whole lot worse THIS IS ALL CALLED DAMAGE CONTROL YOU FUCKING ZOMBIE
--- End quote ---
thaught? suprised? practise?
Yeah. I'm the fool.
--- End quote ---
i thought we had put this to rest I DON'T GIVE A FLYING FUCK ABOUT SPELLING U COCK SUCKER THIS IS A INFORMAL FORUM, NOT WORK, I'M NOT BEING ASSESSED ITS ABOUT DISCUSSING ISSUES.
This is a classic republican ploy when you have no argument or anything to add to the discussion, try and discredit the opposition rather than sticking to the actual issue.
but you are right you are the fool!
Woodrow:
--- Quote from: Don Rizzle on May 17, 2005, 10:33:46 AM ---i thought we had put this to rest I DON'T GIVE A FLYING FUCK ABOUT SPELLING U COCK SUCKER THIS IS A INFORMAL FORUM, NOT WORK, I'M NOT BEING ASSESSED ITS ABOUT DISCUSSING ISSUES.
This is a classic republican ploy when you have no argument or anything to add to the discussion, try and discredit the opposition rather than sticking to the actual issue.
but you are right you are the fool!
--- End quote ---
Classic republican ploy?
How am I supposed to discuss issues with somebody who can't put together a coherent sentence?
You can't spell, but somehow you think you're smart enough to find a case of governmental censorship that nobody else has! Keep up the work Sherlock!
Newsweek retracted the story. The only damage control going on is Newsweek trying to save its reputation because they printed a false story.
Don Rizzle:
--- Quote from: Woodrow on May 17, 2005, 10:51:09 AM ---
--- Quote from: Don Rizzle on May 17, 2005, 10:33:46 AM ---i thought we had put this to rest I DON'T GIVE A FLYING FUCK ABOUT SPELLING U COCK SUCKER THIS IS A INFORMAL FORUM, NOT WORK, I'M NOT BEING ASSESSED ITS ABOUT DISCUSSING ISSUES.
This is a classic republican ploy when you have no argument or anything to add to the discussion, try and discredit the opposition rather than sticking to the actual issue.
but you are right you are the fool!
--- End quote ---
Classic republican ploy?
How am I supposed to discuss issues with somebody who can't put together a coherent sentence?
You can't spell, but somehow you think you're smart enough to find a case of governmental censorship that nobody else has! Keep up the work Sherlock!
Newsweek retracted the story. The only damage control going on is Newsweek trying to save its reputation because they printed a false story.
--- End quote ---
maybe it wasn't gramatically correct and the spelling wasn't great but hey my post never are, this is old ground your not going to get me to make an effort just to impress you. you are no better than me, your points are no more valid than mine because they maybe constructed in the queens english (well american bastardised english). if you couldn't understand what i said in my origional post i suggest you go back to school.
The bush administration was very critical of newsweek, if you don't believe political pressure (direct or indirect) led to the retraction then you really are nieve....if you want me to explain it in simpler terms and go through the chain of events i'll be happy to do that for you.
Low Key:
Either way you look at it, the story being true or not, people were murdered over a fucking book. Yeah, so US troops were flushing pages of the Quaran down the toilet? At least they aren't driving cars full of explosives into the middle of a crowd, killing their own people. I mean, some of yall act like tearing pages out of a book is the worst thing ever. They are trying to interagate people who murder.
And what would happen if they captured a US troop? Give them hot tea and a bath? Fuck no. They would kill them.
And no one here can talk. The troops are over there worried about getting shot or blown up everyday. They aren't over their trying to convert people to christianity, they are over there to bring some stability to a place full of poverty. People just don't understand, the quicker they can get a working government up and a full police force, the US troops will almost all leave. The Iraqis don't want them there, and I'm sure the troops don't want to be there. But no, they can't make this easier.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version