Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Wade vs Kobe
OneHittaSpitta:
i think Kobe has more talent for sure. But id rather have Wade on my team.
acbaylove:
--- Quote from: shamihundal on May 28, 2005, 11:02:59 PM ---
--- Quote from: Mr.PottHead on May 28, 2005, 02:41:24 PM ---
--- Quote from: hisairness on May 28, 2005, 02:38:30 PM ---Wade's the better player of the two because he doesn't have to have the spotlight on him. In fact, based on his personality, it seems that he'd rather not have any spotlight on him at all. Kobe has to be the man, Wade doesn't. If Wade can be average or below average and his team can still win. Kobe has to be damn near spectactular for his team to win.
Go ahead Kobe fans...flame away.
--- End quote ---
stupidest reason why D.Wack is better then kobe.spotlight??? LOL,that has nothing to do whos better
--- End quote ---
First of all I'm a Kings fan. There should be no question that Kobe is better. The reason Wade has not got any spotlight is because he was barely a above average player before Shaq came to the heat. And I think the only reason he is doing better now is because every team they play are worried about Shaq more.
--- End quote ---
Not true at all. The only reason why Wade isnt portrayed as a big ego is because Shaq wasnt jealous of him and he said from day1 that Miami is Wade's team and that Wade is the leader because he's humble and a better professionist than Kobe. Kobe was been portrayed by Shaq and the media as the jealous muthafucka who destroyed the Lakers, while Shaq, to diss Kobe, said Wade was the real deal and he's the real leader he wanted. It's all on Shaq. If Shaq says some pigs are flying, the media will trust him cause Shaq creates business.
hisairness:
...Kobe is a "jealous muthafucka who destroyed the Lakers"
I don't like Shaq much...but there was something definitely wrong in LA. The numbers show that Kobe's team couldn't do as well without Shaq. I don't understand why people praise Kobe so much. I understand you are Lakers fans but shit...have some common sense.
Javier:
From day 1 Kobe was never part of the team, he was always the outsider. All the problms the team experienced and that team appeared in the NBA FInals 4 out 5 and won 3 of them. Shows a lot from not just Shaq, but from Kobe, Phil and the suppurting cast.
A big number people like to use with players that play with Shaq is FG% or eFG%
This is Kobe's eFG% without Shaq. 48.2
This is Wade's eFG% with Shaq. 48.3
What do I get out of this? Well kobe is still an efficient shooter even when the team is relying on you to lead the team and to post up a similiar to Wade who has the help of Shaq shows you how better of a season Kobe had than Wade...if you look at the raw numbers.
E. J. Rizo:
--- Quote from: 7even the Annoyed One on May 28, 2005, 06:29:53 PM ---Maybe still Kobe, Wade might pretty damn sure be a lot better in a couple years, though. People overrate Kobe like motherfuckers. Those 3 rings dont prove SHIT. There are like 10-15 active guards who would have had 3 rings with SHAQ and PHIL in 6 years, during Shaq's prime. And that's the truth. Shaq was the reason why Lakers were what they were, not Kobe. Of course it wouldnt have been that great without Kobe, but a lot of players could have REPLACED Kobe. While no motherfuckin Center would have been able to replace Shaq. I know this forum is filled with Kobe dickriders, but deep down in your motherfucking heart you know Im so damn right that is makes you puke.
--- End quote ---
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version