It's May 21, 2024, 08:57:58 AM
i wish warren could hook up with the twinz, dove shack, 5 footaz and foesum to bring back the gfunk music...they all under one label...but nah, better stop dreamin right here
dawm, myrealname, i think u should close your mouth a lil bit, man you postin about every 2 or 3 posts wtf, i think we understand what u sayin and we understand that u want cuzzinz first album. now pleez
1) you didn't know that only ONE fan actually paid up for $500... how many other holes are there in you information? (btw Kronik gave this information out)2) Some of the projects have OBVIOUSLY had to CANCELLED be since they were to be done with Kurupt. DUMMY how can he make projects with someone he doesnt work with anymore!?!?! 3) again HOLES in your DUMB POST!! daz has mentioned these projects many times in many different places. as we have PROVED you dont seem to know all the details DUMMY!!
1) daz owns the tracks 2) you are correct daz does have to pay afeni if pac is on a track.3) afeni claimed pac paid for the studio time. therefore claiming that she owned the tracks. meaning daz had to go to court with receipts to prove he paid for it. (this was the major cause of delay)4) daz proved his case. BUT.. afeni refused daz clearance to release the tracks. thereby blocking daz's project. daz agreed with afeni that if she releases the verses first he can release his project after.5) this means Afeni blocked it so she could make more money out of pac's tracks.
No!!Afeni doesnt own the tracks!Daz paid for studio time, they're his.. but they still need approval from the estate for usage.Daz agreed to let her use them first so that he could release his stuff at all! He cant drop Mak&Dilli until Afeni has had the verses run by some lame pop-ass producers.Basically she blackmailed his ass.
Daz wasn't being arrogant!
Daz owns the tracks! (how many times i have to say this?). Afeni just has to 'Ok' the usage of the material because it features pac.
i dont see any problem with this?she's not the only one who can release them!but.. she has to approve any usage of 2pac material.she blocked daz releasing them first so she could make more money.
afeni has pulled sheisty shit in the past. like what happened with bad azz not being paid for krazy saying shit like "you should be lucky to have worked with pac at all" and fucking up his first album by blocking the use of the song "ghetto star" just before it dropped.. he had to remove pac's verses.
That last point about Daz is true.I dont understand why the re-hash 2pacs stuff.. this shit was meant to be heard with daz, just like Ghetto Star OG they go back2back on that track.(ghetto star OG intro)bad azz : for all my low-life thug niggaz2pac : for all my niggaz in the hood.. living the life of a ghetto starits not right to stop this! the song seems empty without pac!thank god for the makavelli bootlegs so we know how she's fucked and distorted his works.
Bad Azz sues 2Pac's estate and others for failing to credit and pay him Los Angeles-based Priority recording artist Bad Azz is filing a $500,000lawsuit against Tupac Shakur's estate|, as well as Deathrow Records,Interscope Records, Joshua's Dream, Interscope Pearl Music, Suge Publishing,and Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp., for breach of fiduciary duty, LanhamAct violations, breach of implied contract, misappropriation of voice,accounting, and declaratory relief. In the US District Court of Californiaon Friday, August 20, Bad Azz alleged said parties failed to pay royaltiesor properly credit him for rhyming on, and co-writing, "Krazy," a songfeatured on 2Pac's 1996 album, Makeveli's The Don Killuminati: The SevenDay Theory. The suit reads, in part, "As [Bad Azz] and Tupac were co-writers of thesong, Tupac and Afeni [2Pac's mother and estate administrator], owed [BadAzz] fiduciary duties of loyalty, trust, and confidence which required Tupacand Afeni to act in the best interests of [Bad Azz] and not to use theirfiduciary position for their own benefit or to the detriment of [Bad Azz].Tupac and Afeni breached their fiduciary duties by 1) not accounting to andpaying [Bad Azz] his share of revenue generated by the song; and 2) failingto take steps to assure [Bad Azz] received appropriate label credit as asongwriter." Bad Azz is seeking back royalties for his work on theMakeveli album, which Soundscan credits as having sold over 3.5million copies.
news story about the Bad Azz vs Death Row/Afeni http://www.rollingstone.com/news/newsarticle.asp?nid=8961&cf=6251You have a lot of events and times mixed up.The Ghetto Star thing was years before the later disses.
^ exactly..... antonio's trying to argue that a track on bad azz's FIRST ALBUM was affected by a diss on his SECOND ALBUM.. years later