Lifestyle > Train of Thought

Do you consider George Bush a terrorist?

(1/7) > >>

Maestro Minded:
Considering that he've attacked two countries without valid reasons.

1. He attacked Afghanistan because they refused to hand over Bin Laden, a man USA was suspecting for the bombings. A country should have the right to deny a request like that from any other country.
2. He attacked Iraq, because he believed Sadam Hussein had mass destruction weapon. Obviously he didn't, which must mean that the 'proof' USA had couldn't have been strong enough.

25'000 innocent victims in Iraq have been killed because of George Bush.

-----------------------------
i will only respond to serious posts, it doesnt matter what you vote, just justify your answer

Don Jacob:
you can make a case for iraq....


but we had no reason to attack Afghanistan??

UAK:
George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden are equals to me.

Low Key:
The Afgahnistan government should have handed over Bin Laden. They didn't, so the US went in and tried to get him themselves. Whether it was him or some other person in Al Queda, someone was responsible for murdering 5,000 people and injuring several thousand more.

Dubya entered Iraq because of a grudge. Saddam was a menace, but I didn't think it was particularly necessary to do what Bush did.

Elevz:
I actually think both wars George Bush started can be justified. Of course Afghanistan should have handed over Osama immediately. Since they didn't, Bush had to go hunt after Osama himself. What's wrong with that? You're saying they should've let Osama go, so he could plan some more major attacks?

The difference between George Bush and Osama bin Laden is that Bush doesn't intend to kill as many civilians as possible. That's the only thing a terrorist is up to: making as many people fall victim as possible. Bush is only trying to better the world, by trying to free us from terrorism. Of course Bush wasn't actually out to look for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, he came there to take Saddam off his throne. That's a good deed, hence Saddam was like a terrorist himself, killing people in his own country at random. Bush ain't out for that, he's trying to free the people from terrorism. You just can't fight a war without innocent people falling victim. Just don't blame Bush for intending to do so.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page