Bret Hart vs. Ric Flair

[Perfection]

Ric Flair was the better wrestler, the better draw, & the better all round performer.

Bret always talks about the Summerslam match against Davy Boy Smith at wembley in front of 86000 to prove that he can draw, but the crowd wasn't there for him, this was the first 'supershow' that wwe/wwf had promoted outside of the states/canada, the main event was a british wrestler & wwe events always sell out in Britain.

Bret wasn't even the best wrestler to come out of his dad 'dungeon' Dynamite Kid wins that award by some margin imo, Dynamithe Kid doesn't have a lot of affection for Bret, mainly due to bret's behaviour & attitude to various people that helped bret become the star that he was.  In Brets mind he made so many wrestlers & had some of the greatest matches ever since he started (which imo is bollocks), whereas Ric Flair did make many wrestlers carreers, & he had the ability to carry a broomstick to a good match.

Flair should have quit a long time ago, as his current (past 10-14 years) performances have hindered the legacy that he had.  The drawing power that flair had in wcw/nwa was outstanding (especially compared to the wwf at that time).

The original (well the 1st few) 4 horseman is also the best ever 4 man group of wrestlers ever & flair was a huge influence on how good they were.

Flair was better, however as a booker he sucked big time

Dynamite Kid was a trained wrestler before he went to Calgary for Stampede Wrestling