It's May 09, 2024, 08:47:27 AM
Quote from: Juronimo is Public Enemy #1 on September 16, 2005, 12:31:33 PMThe funny thing is that the Laker Haters are still obsessed with greatest franchise in sports, even though we had a shitty year last year. They're still obsessed, like a jilted lover or a stalker.Celtics > Lakers
The funny thing is that the Laker Haters are still obsessed with greatest franchise in sports, even though we had a shitty year last year. They're still obsessed, like a jilted lover or a stalker.
The celtics haven't done shit sinse the bill russel days..and i would not be surprised if their was some dirty shit behind that..kareem said that when he was with the bucks and faced the celtics in the finals when this one guy was the ref the celtics were getting away with climbing on kareems back and fouling him and all kinds of shit..that guy reft 4 games..celtics won them all..the other 3 with a different ref the bucks won those games...so it's the Lakers>>celtics80's: Magic & the Lakers were better then Bird and the celtics...Lakers 5 championships and went to the finals like 8-9 times..celtics 3 championships90's: Lakers..we drafted kobe and signed shaq 2 weeks LaterThe 2 g's: Lakers 3 straight champioships and went to the finals 4 times..celtics best they did is get to the ECF in 2002the celtics have been to the finals 19 times..Lakers 28 and 14 championships..yeah the celtics have 2 more championships but that don't mean shit when you haven't done shit sinse the early 70's and the Lakers been to the finals 9 more times
NIK is still trying to figure why Kobe cheated on him with that white girl from the hotel & spa
NIK, you ARE so dumb that even when people show you the actual facts that the Celtics dynasty is superior to the Lakers, you still dont get it. Another example would be how (in fairness to you) I posted the 2004-2005 NBA stats of LeBron James and Kobe Bryant. Now, stats dont lie my friend, and clearly it was proven that James was the better player. You still couldnt get it. Now I have 2 questions to ask you 1) Are you REALLY that dumb? and or 2) are you really on Kobe's dick THAT much?
Quote from: PLANT on September 17, 2005, 12:27:04 PMNIK, you ARE so dumb that even when people show you the actual facts that the Celtics dynasty is superior to the Lakers, you still dont get it. Another example would be how (in fairness to you) I posted the 2004-2005 NBA stats of LeBron James and Kobe Bryant. Now, stats dont lie my friend, and clearly it was proven that James was the better player. You still couldnt get it. Now I have 2 questions to ask you 1) Are you REALLY that dumb? and or 2) are you really on Kobe's dick THAT much?Lakers fans don't follow stats unless it's in the Lakers' favor. That guy was bragging that the Lakers won 3 titles in a row, Celtics won 8. Braggin' that the Lakers won 14 titles, Celtics got 16. Braggin' that the Lakers been to the finals 28 times, which means they've lost 14... Celtics been there 19 only lost 3 times. Braggin' about the Lakers' roster... None of that matter cuz they still haven't surpassed the Celtics.Where are the stats showing the Lakers are the better franchise or Dynasty? There are none. They're just mad. And I'm FROM L.A.
Do you even know anything about basketball? LMAO...The Lakers made it to the finals 28 times which means they've put together 28 top-notch teams...The Cetics haven't put together any top-notch teams in quite a while...Lakers have so much more to their name, George Mikan, Jerry West, Elgin Baylor, Wilt Chamberlain, Gail Goodrich, Magic, Worthy, Kareem, Shaq, Kobe...The list goes on. It's so obvious that the name Lakers is so much bigger than anything related to the Celtics, and the Laker franchise is the most recognized and succesful in all of basketball...Now get the fuck out of basketball talk. You're not from LA either...PeACe