Lifestyle > Train of Thought

Tony Blair Defeated Over New Terror Laws

<< < (3/3)

King Tech Quadafi:
If the police have reason to believe that a persons a terror suspect wouldnt that in itself be good to enough to legally pursue that person. I mean can some one explain this "evidence" which suitable to identify a suspect but not good to enough to base a pursuit of the suspect on? What the hell to do u need Facists civil rights abuses in order to better protect ya self.

Damn, fuckin 19 Arab fuckers has systematically transformed and restructured western society.

Pathetic. Imagine when shit really pops off.

Westerners = Soft Like Butta


PS: Don Nizzle  you are the most confused mofo on this board, bar none.

Don Rizzle:
in this country u need concrete evidence to convict people in courts otherside they walk free, police may have reason to believe people are planning things but they need time to prove that without doubt, time which is in short supply when people are planning on killing others without warning, atleast the IRA would tip us off before the bombs went off islamist terrorists do not....

King Tech Quadafi:
God damn man. You dont arrest people just to turn around and immediately convict them. You arrest when u have suspician of a crime.
You pursure a suspect, hold em till trial then u judge them.

If u have a reason to believe someone is a terrorist, then that reason should be sufficient enought for you to have the legalistic options to pursue them. Why the hell do u need the right to detain some one indefinitely?

MidoriHaze:

We (Australia) have just passed laws of a similar nature but aren't as stringent and perhaps more realistic. The new laws, which also allowed the 17 terror suspects to be arrested, allow for a person to be held without charge for 14days.

In the case of Britan it sounds as though a lot of those MP's weren't casting a conscience vote, but were voting with their career in mind. Seeing Blair go down on this agenda would have made a lot of those MP's cross the floor.

However 90 days does sound far too extreme, not because i care about the rights of terrorist but for those innocent people that will become mixed up and fall trapped in with the laws.

Don Rizzle:
^^ the difference between britain and australia is we have to abide by the eu human rights legislation which basically means we are not allowed to deport people if they are going to be tortured which translates to we pretty much aren't allowed to deport any islamist terrorist! australia can just kick who the fuck they like out of their country.

tech 90 days is not indefinite, and it wouldn't always be 90 days its up to 90days incase it takes that long to gather enough evidence to secure a conviction.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page