Lifestyle > Train of Thought

You agree or disagree with withdrawal from iraq?

<< < (16/18) > >>

J @ M @ L:

--- Quote from: I TO DA GEEZY on November 25, 2005, 03:42:45 AM ---How could he have promoted anti-Palestinian propaganda when at his time Palestinians didn't even exist? lol guy honestly thought this land was empty of inhabitants....

--- End quote ---

It wasn't anti-Palestinian propaganda, you tool. It was Zionist propaganda and you have just proven that you're a victim. You think if the Zionists did it then, they wouldn't do it now? Your country was established on propaganda, and it continues to thrive on propaganda. I know not every Israeli citizen is as dumb and gullible as you. It's official like a referee with a whistle: You're a brainwashed tool who blindly supports the terrorist state of Israel.

Stop whining about anti-Semitism when somebody criticizes Israel's actions because you look like a little bitch.
Instead of whining, just go grab a gun and run outside to kill some Palestinian kids... take your frustration out that way... I mean, it's not like the terrorist government of Israel is going find you guilty of anything... as seen from the article.  :)




Kassem:

--- Quote from: I TO DA GEEZY on November 25, 2005, 08:10:44 AM ---
--- Quote from: Kassem on November 25, 2005, 07:53:36 AM ---WAKE UP, far from every Muslim is a radical fundamentalist

,so if someone is not a muslim,that means he won't fight against an occupation to his country.

--- End quote ---

Occupation? Wouldn't you define their current lives as lives under occupation?- well it's not an occupation by an outsider but an occupation indeed and more importantly from within their country by their autocratic governmental establishment. If anything, such "occupation" would only free them from the binds of their confined being.

--- End quote ---

wat the fuck are u talking about,i lived in 3 different arab countries,and in non did i feel under an occupation,before going on about other countries problems u don't know about.

Javier:
"Administration Seems Willing to Conceive Iraq Withdrawal
By Paul Richter and Tyler Marshall, Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON -- Even as debate over the Iraq war continues to rage, signs are emerging of a convergence of opinion on how the Bush administration might begin to get out of the conflict.

In a departure from past statements, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said this week that the training of Iraqi troops has advanced so far that the current number of U.S. troops probably will not be needed for much longer.

President Bush will give a major speech Wednesday at the U.S. Naval Academy in which aides say he is expected to proclaim the improved readiness of Iraqi troops, which he has identified as the key condition for withdrawing U.S. forces."


from L.A Times

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-withdraw26nov26,0,4761481.story?coll=la-home-headlines

I TO DA GEEZY:

--- Quote from: Kassem on November 25, 2005, 02:52:18 PM ---
--- Quote from: I TO DA GEEZY on November 25, 2005, 08:10:44 AM ---
--- Quote from: Kassem on November 25, 2005, 07:53:36 AM ---WAKE UP, far from every Muslim is a radical fundamentalist

,so if someone is not a muslim,that means he won't fight against an occupation to his country.

--- End quote ---

Occupation? Wouldn't you define their current lives as lives under occupation?- well it's not an occupation by an outsider but an occupation indeed and more importantly from within their country by their autocratic governmental establishment. If anything, such "occupation" would only free them from the binds of their confined being.

--- End quote ---
wat the fuck are u talking about,i lived in 3 different arab countries,and in non did i feel under an occupation,before going on about other countries problems u don't know about.

--- End quote ---

I wonder which countries are those, do you mind telling me?
And as I said there is a (quote):


--- Quote from: I TO DA GEEZY on November 25, 2005, 12:43:40 AM ---small percentage of brainwashed people

--- End quote ---

what could explain why you didn't feel "under an occupation".

I TO DA GEEZY:

--- Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on November 25, 2005, 02:33:06 PM ---It wasn't anti-Palestinian propaganda. It was Zionist propaganda
--- End quote ---

Really?


But didn't you say that:


--- Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on October 18, 2005, 05:24:00 PM ---The problem isn't even Sharon or any of these other fucktards... it's the nature of Zionist ideology

--- End quote ---

.
.
.
On what ground then do you oppose the nature of the Zionist ideology when the person reckoned to be somewhat of a catalyst of the entire Jewish self-determination movement(Zionism) did not have any anti-Palestinian agenda? On what ground do you side the main catalysts of the Palestinian self-determination who clearly did have blatant anti-Jewish agendas from the start of their formal self-proclamation as " A PEOPLE"?


What you're saying is that even if there was no such thing as "Palestinians" you would still be against Israel's existence due to:


--- Quote from: I TO DA GEEZY on October 19, 2005, 02:27:39 AM ---Zionism- Jewish  movement that has had as it's goal the creation and support of a Jewish national state in (what was known as) Palestine, the ancient homeland of the Jews (Hebrew:"Eretz Yisrael"-The Land Of Israel).

--- End quote ---

even though you claim that you're not against Israel's existence:


--- Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on October 19, 2005, 12:20:20 PM ---Then YOU say that I want Israel off the world's map.... which is complete bullshit

--- End quote ---

while also claiming that Israel is a :


--- Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on November 25, 2005, 01:02:09 AM ---terrorist state

--- End quote ---

and while saying you're against terrorism

So does anyone else see a contradiction here?
before arguing you should first decide on what you're trying to prove and to whom.


 







Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version