Author Topic: Soriano to the Dodgers?  (Read 101 times)

BizzyR.I.P.

  • Guest
Soriano to the Dodgers?
« on: December 06, 2005, 09:09:32 PM »
They said on ESPN that Texas & the Dodgers are in talks for this trade, they said the deal would involve Jonathan Broxton. What would this mean for Izturis then?
 

Javier

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 8585
  • Karma: 284
Re: Soriano to the Dodgers?
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2005, 09:14:14 PM »
THis onyl makes sense if he plays LF.
 

BizzyR.I.P.

  • Guest
Re: Soriano to the Dodgers?
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2005, 09:16:05 PM »
THis onyl makes sense if he plays LF.
He didn't want to move to SS for Texas...
 

Javier

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 8585
  • Karma: 284
Re: Soriano to the Dodgers?
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2005, 09:18:47 PM »
Welp then we shouldnt get him, plus new stuff from dodgers.com   .....


there were reports the Dodgers had inquired about Texas second baseman Alfonso Soriano, although his salary and the Rangers' insistence on top prospects would seem to make that a longer shot.
 

WestCoasta

  • Guest
Re: Soriano to the Dodgers?
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2005, 09:23:14 PM »
fuck that, they need Izturis, huge mistake if they start to slowly push Izturis out.....


I would have however liked it better if they got Soriano instead of Furcal, Soriano would make a bigger impact in the longrun with RBI's...

I woulda been happy with him at 2nd and Robles at SS for half the season  :P until Izturis got back...


oh well.
 

I Am The Anton

  • Muthafuckin' Double OG
  • ****
  • Posts: 734
  • Karma: -26
Re: Soriano to the Dodgers?
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2005, 01:05:54 AM »
This sounds like a pointless move to pursue,but whatever.


I need some meaning I can memorize
The kind I have always seems to slip my mind
 

WestCoasta

  • Guest
Re: Soriano to the Dodgers?
« Reply #6 on: December 07, 2005, 11:01:46 AM »
^^^^ LMFAO at your sig of the Raptors  :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: